SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 14142

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR, ANUROOP SINGHI, JJ
Mukesh Soni, Omprakash – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
D.B. Civil Writ Petition(PIL) No. 15151/2025



Advocates:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Kunal Bishnoi, Mr. Sidharth Lalas

Creation of a Public Land Protection Cell is essential for effective resolution of encroachments on public land, reinforcing systematic legal compliance.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Encroachment of public land - Petitioners seek direction for removal of encroachment in specified Khasra - Court mandates creation of Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) for rural areas to handle encroachment complaints effectively, ensuring compliance with Supreme Court directives in related cases. (Paras 3-5)

(B) Removal of Encroachments - It is established that removal of encroachments is the rule, while regularization is an exception, which can only be permitted under limited circumstances. (Para 4)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners seek redressal for encroachment issues in their locality and were directed to represent before the newly established PLPC for action within a set timeline.

Findings of Court:
The Court supports the establishment of a mechanism to address encroachments and allows petitioners to submit representation for timely resolution.

Issues: Whether the respondents will address encroachment complaints via PLPC and within a specified time frame.

Ratio Decidendi: A systematic response to encroachments on public land is mandated to prevent excessive litigation and ensure legal compliance.

Result: Writ petition disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. petitioners filed a writ for removal of land encroachment. (Para 1 , 2)
2. creation of plpc is necessary for addressing public land complaints. (Para 3)
3. respondents to process petitions via plpc in a timely manner. (Para 4 , 5)

Order

08/08/2025

1. The defect(s) pointed out by the office are over ruled.

2. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred claiming the following reliefs:- "1. It is, therefore, humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly allow this public interest litigation by an appropriate writ, order or direction;

2. That respondents may kindly be directed to remove the encroachment in Khasra No.85 Village Jhorda, Tehsil Nagaur, District Nagaur.”

3. A Division Bench of this Court in Jagdish Prashad Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.10819/2018, vide order dated 30.01.2019, has directed creation of Public Land Protection Cell(PLPC) for rural areas in every district; the relevant portion of the order reads as follows:-

"This Court is inundated with large number of writ petitions, styled as public interest litigation, from almost all the Districts of the State, with allegations of encroachment over the pasture land/ land of ‘johad’, ‘talab’/ river/river bed/ public way/ Shamshan/Kabristan etc. In all such petitions, common allegation is that despite repeated complaints/representations to the concerned revenue officers, no steps are taken by them to remove the encroachment. This results in number of writ petitions being filed by the complainants/representationists before this Court. This Court has been passing orders in such matters equiring the respective District Collectors to examine the factual content of the allegations and take steps to remove the encroachments so as to secure such land.

In order therefore to provide a pan-Rajasthan solution to this ever persisting problem, we deem it appropriate to direct the Chief Secretary of the State to devise a permanent mechanism, which should be operational in every District of the State where the concerned District Collector should be required to periodically notify for the information of the general public to lodge the complaints/representations with regard to such encroachments with a specially designated Public Land Protection Cell (for short ‘PLPC’) for rural areas. The PLPC should be headed by District Collector and function under his direction and supervision. The PLPC shall get such complaints/representations enquired into by deputing concerned Sub Divisional Officer/ Tehsildar/ Naib Tehsildar so as to verify whether or not such encroachments have actually taken place on such land. If the allegations are found to be substantiated, appropriate steps in accordance with law be immediately taken for removal of the encroachments and appropriate penal action be also taken against the trespassers. The complaints/representations received in the PLPC should be decided by passing speaking order, informing the respective complainant/representationist about the action taken. This would obviate the necessity of such complainants/

representationists approaching this Court directly by way of public interest litigation. If this practice is put in place, this Court would not be inclined to directly entertain such public interest litigation or would do so only in the event of inaction on the part of the concerned PLPC.

The PLPC aforementioned shall also keep in view the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court in Jagpal Singh & Others Vs. State of Punjab & Others, (2011) 11 SCC 396 wherein all the State Governments of the country were directed that they should prepare schemes for eviction of illegal/unauthorised occupants of the Gram Sabha/Gram Panchayat/Poramboke/ Shamlat land and the same must be restored to the Gram Sabha /Gram Panchayat for the common use of villagers of the village. The said scheme should provide for the speedy eviction of such illegal occupants, after giving th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top