Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
ARUN MONGA, J
Abdul Raseed – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Kareem – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant seeks condonation of delay. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. explanation for delay found insufficient. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. legal precedents regarding limitations and sufficient cause. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. appeal dismissed due to lack of grounds. (Para 10) |
| 5. final decision rendered. (Para 11 , 12) |
Order (Oral)
1. Applicant seeks condonation of delay of 498 days in filing the accompanied appeal. For the reasons stated hereinafter, this is not a fit case where discretion to condone the delay ought to be exercised.
3. For ready reference the content of the application is as below:
2. That though while filing the instant appeal, unintentional and bonafide delay has occurred but the same has been occurred not only for the bonafide reasons but also spread of virus Covid-19 in all over the word and due to imposition of complete lockdown in the country and also hindered functioning of the courts in Rajasthan, the appellant was prevented by sufÏcient cause from filing the instant appeal within the period of limitation and as such, the unintentional and bonafide delay occurred in filing of the instant appeal is liable to be condoned in the interest of justice.
4. Having seen the averme
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
