Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
FARJAND ALI, J
Lalit Kumar Duggar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of cheating involve mutual accusations in a land transaction. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. the court highlights civil nature of dispute and lack of criminal intent. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. essential elements of ipc offenses must be substantiated for prosecution. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. lack of mens rea undermines criminal charges. (Para 14 , 20 , 21 , 27) |
| 5. the fir quashed; no criminal wrongdoing established. (Para 28 , 29) |
Order
Order Reserved On : 25/02/2025 Order Pronounced On : 22 /05/2025
1. The instant misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. have been preferred by the petitioners for quashing of the FIR No. 332/2022 PS Kotwali, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan for the offence under Sections 420 , 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the IPC and FIR No. 384/2021 PS Kotwali, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan for the offence under Sections 406 , 420 and 120-B of the IPC.
2. In the present case, two FIRs have been lodged at the police station Kotwali, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan, which form the subject matter of these petitions. An FIR No. 384/2021 was lodged at the instance of Gograj Anchaliya against Tejkaran Jain, alleging offences of cheating and criminal breach of trust in conne
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
