Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
KULDEEP MATHUR, J
Lal Das – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks quashing of fir based on alibi. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court cannot assess credibility of allegations pre-investigation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. conditions for quashing fir not met as per existing law. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. petition dismissed without further inquiry. (Para 8) |
Order
26/05/2025
1. By way of filing the present criminal misc. petition under Section 528 BNSS, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
“It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Misc. Petition may kindly be allowed and the F.I.R. No. 62/2025 Police Station, Hathuniya, District- Pratapgath for the offence under Sections 189 (2), 115(2), 126(2) AND 109 (1) OF B.N.S. and its entire investigation including filing of charge sheet, if any, may kindly be quashed and set aside qua the petitioner.
In the alternative police authority may kindly be directed to the investigated the matter fairly and impartially in the impugned FIR.
Any other appropriate order in the facts and circumstances of the case, in favour of petitioner may kindly be passed.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and has been falsely roped in a criminal case. Lea
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
