Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Upman, J
Meetu Pareek, Indu Verma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail applications for bailable offenses should be processed promptly. (Para 1 , 12) |
| 2. judicial officers failed to appropriately consider bail applications, leading to wrongful custody. (Para 2 , 7 , 14) |
| 3. personal liberty is paramount, and judicial officers must exercise their discretion with care. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 4. the principles around arrest necessitate adherence to law and guidelines to protect individual rights. (Para 4 , 10) |
Order
27/08/2025
1. While granting bail to the petitioners, explanation was sought by this Court from the concerned Judicial Magistrate who extended police or judicial remand of the petitioners and dismissed the bail application filed by them under Section 480 BNSS, although the accused-petitioners before him/her are accused of bailable offences. Learned ADJ was also directed to place his explanation before this court who further dismissed the bail application filed by the petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
2. In pursuance of directions issued by this Court, the explanation has been submitted by the concerned judicial officers. This Court is not satisfied with the explanation as it has made an attempt in showing that the ingredients of Sect
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
