Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
ANAND SHARMA, J
Divya Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges denial of bonus marks based on experience. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondents argue experience certificate lacks authority and validity. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. contested equivalency of positions not adequately supported by evidence. (Para 5 , 10) |
| 4. court finds only competent authority can validate experience claims. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. disputed factual determinations cannot be revisited unless grossly erroneous. (Para 9 , 12) |
| 6. court dismisses petition, affirming adherence to recruitment rules. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
Judgment
RESERVED ON :: 11.09.2025
PRONOUNCED ON :: 20.09.2025
1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition assailing order dated 11.03.2025 passed by the Director, Medical & Health Services, whereby his representation for grant of bonus marks towards experience on the post of Pharmacist has been rejected. The petitioner prays for quashing of the said order and issuance of a direction to the respondents to award him 15 bonus marks for his services rendered as COVID Health Assistant (CHA) on the ground that the petitioner discharged duties similar to that of a Pharmacist.
2. The facts pleaded by the petitioner, in brief, are that pursuant to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
