Back
2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 11710
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
SUNIL BENIWAL, J
Geetanjali College Of Nursing, Borawar, Nagaur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
Civil Writ Petition No. 13318/2024
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. SK Shrimali
For the Respondents: Mr. Sangram Singh, Mr. Mahendra Bishnoi, Ms. Kanchan Jodha for Mr. N.S. Rajpurohit, AAG
A writ petition can be disposed of favorably if compliance with legal and procedural requirements is ensured and prior judgments are followed.
Headnote:In the present case, the petitioner seeks the issuance of a NOC to establish a new college for B.Sc. course and inclusion in the admission process for the academic session 2024-25. The Court found that the NOC was subsequently granted and disposed of the writ petition in the same terms as a prior case, ensuring the petitioner adheres to the guidelines and is liable for dues. The main issues addressed included adherence to procedural regulations and compliance in seeking recognition for the college.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner requests noc for b.sc. course. (Para 1) |
| 2. no objection from respondents to disposition. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. petitioner liable for fees and required to follow guidelines. (Para 5) |
| 4. all other pending applications disposed. (Para 6) |
Order
13/10/2025
1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers :-
‘1. By an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents may kindly be directed to issue the NOC for establishing the new college for B.Sc course; and (B) Further by an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents may kindly be directed to include the petitioner college in the admission process for the B.Sc. course for academic session 2024-25 onwards; and the respondent may be directed to allot the students to the petitioner instate for the B.Sc.course.
(C) That the respondents may be directed to allow the petitioner institution to admit students in the B.Sc. course for the academic year 2024-25 onwards by issuance of NOC; with intake capacity of 60 seats, and (D) The respondent university may be further directed to accept the annual affiliation and other fees from the petitioner institution:
(E) Further by an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents may kindly be refrained from rejecting the NOC of the petitioner institution.’
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the NOC has been granted to the petitioner-institution. He further submits that in view of the subsequent developments and while considering the order dated 18.09.2025 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18967/2025 (Mr. Ramayan Shikshan Sansthan Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.), the present writ petition ma also be disposed of in the same terms.
3. At this stage, learned counsel for the respondents submit that respondents have no objection if the present writ petition is disposed of in the same terms as in the case of Ramayan Shikshan Sansthan (supra), however, submit that petitioner would be liable for payment of the affiliation fee, including late fee and penalty, if any, and the petitioner would be required to adhere with the guidelines of RUHS/RNC and other authorities while seeking affiliation/recognition.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondents.
5. In view of the submissions made above, the present writ petition is disposed of in the same terms in light of the order passed in the case of Ramayan Shikshan Sansthan (supra) with further conditions that the petitioner would be liable for payment of the affiliation fee, including late fee and penalty, if any, and the petitioner would be required to adhere with the guidelines of RUHS/RNC and other authorities while seeking affiliation/recognition.
6. All other pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
