[2025:RJ-JP:48307]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13807/2025 Subhash Chandra S/o Phool Chand, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Majhau, Police Station Gudhagaurji, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Jhunjhunu (Raj.)

----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arpan Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

Order

27/11/2025

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 140/2025 registered at Police Station Mukundgarh District Jhunjhunu for the offence(s) under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 112(2), 61(2)(a) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of IT Act, 2008.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family, aged about 33 years. It is further submitted that the applicant is taxi driver by profession. Moreover, it is submitted that allegations of renting the bank accounts in order to earn commission were levelled against the applicant. It is also submitted that applicant is behind bars ever since 19.09.2025 and that the charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the instant bail application and submitted that there are as many as twelve complaints registered against the applicant and it has been revealed, during the course of investigation, that the applicant is in possession of several bank accounts.

4. Having heard the submissions made by learned counsel for the respective parties and taking note of the fact that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family, aged about 33 years; that the applicant is in custody since 19.09.2025; that charge- sheet has already been filed in the matter, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances but without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail.

5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Subhash Chandra S/o Phool Chand shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

6. Taking note of the subject matter and place reliance upon the ratio and directions spelled out in SBCRLMB No. 9343/2025 titled as Mohit Vs. State of Raj. this Court is of the view that in addition to the condition as imposed, the following conditions are also to be abided by the applicant. For the sake of convenience the conditions imposed upon the applicant is reproduced herein below:-

"a. Banking Restrictions:

i) The financial transactions of the accused-applicant shall remain confined to one designated bank account, details of which shall be furnished to the Investigating Officer (I.O.) and the learned Trial Court, prior to release on bail. Moreover, if multiple accounts are operative in any Bank, under the name of the accused- applicant(s)/convicted person, the same shall be closed with immediate effect i.e. prior to release of the applicant(s).

ii) The monthly bank statement of the said account shall be submitted regularly to both the I.O. and the Trial Court during the pendency of the trial.

iii) The Reserve Bank of India may also be directed to issue an advisory/circular restraining the accused- applicant from opening any new bank account linked to his personal identifiers such as AADHAR Card and PAN Card, during the pendency of the proceedings. b. Disclosure of Financial Instruments:

i) The accused-applicant shall provide complete details of all bank accounts and digital payment wallets (including but not limited to Payt