Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR, RAVI CHIRANIA, JJ
Yatendra Kumar Nagori – Appellant
Versus
The Special Secretary Cum Vice Chairperson – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. chronology of the petitioner’s employment and the incidents leading to termination. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by the petitioner regarding the validity of allegations. (Para 4) |
| 3. assessment of due process and the inquiry process regarding the serious allegations. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. final ruling, emphasizing the dismissal of the writ petition based on findings. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
BY THE COURT
: (Per Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vinit Kumar Mathur)
1. The present writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 28.8.2024 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as the learned tribunal) whereby the learned tribunal has rejected the original application filed by the petitioner against the order dated 16.10.2015 passed by the disciplinary authority whereby the petitioner has been terminated from the services.
2. The facts in nut shell are that initially the petitioner came to be appointed as Primary Teacher in the respondent – Kendriya Vidyala Sangthan, Jaipur Region vide appointment order dated 15.1.1990. On 6.2.2015, a complaint was lodged against the petitioner reg
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
