[2025:RJ-JP:49646]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13756/2025 Shakeel Ahmed Son Of Safi Shah, Aged About 54 Years, R/o House No. C-659, Shaeed Indra Jyoti Nagar, Kachchi Basti, Police Station Bhatta Basti, Jaipur ( At Present In Central Jail Jaipur)

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Basant Singh Rathore with Mr. Gaurav Soni For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP Mr. Hanuman Sahai, ASI, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

Order

06/12/2025

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 400/2025 registered at Police Station Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur City North for the offence(s) under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 61(2) of BNS.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family. It is submitted that charge-sheet has been filed and applicant is in custody ever since 13.09.2025. It is further submitted that complaint was registered by police authorities and not by any private person. Learned counsel further submits that the conclusion of trial is likely to take a long time and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant behind bars till disposal of the case.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. Investigating Officer has marked presence in the Court and has submitted that there are 33 complaints registered on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal against the applicant. It is further submitted that there is transaction of Rs. 5.26 Crores. Howsoever, applicant is accomplished to loan amount on commission and received a sum of Rs. 25,000/-.

4. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that accused-applicant is sole bread earner of the family; that charge-sheet has been filed; that as per provisions of Section 78 of the IT Act, investigation is not carried out by a police officer of rank of Inspector; that applicant is in custody ever since 13.09.2025; that charge sheet has been filed, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail.

5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Shakeel Ahmed Son Of Safi Shah shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

6. Taking note of the subject matter and placing reliance upon the ratio and directions spelled out in SBCRLMB No.

9343/2025 titled as Mohit Vs. State of Raj. this Court is of the view that in addition to the condition as imposed, the following conditions are also to be abided by the applicant. For the sake of convenience the conditions imposed upon the applicant are reproduced herein below:-

"a. Banking Restrictions:

i) The financial transactions of the accused-applicant shall remain confined to one designated bank account, details of which shall be furnished to the Investigating Officer (I.O.) and the learned Trial Court, prior to release on bail. Moreover, if multiple accounts are operative in any Bank, under the name of the accused- applicant(s)/convicted person, the same shall be closed with immediate effect i.e. prior to release of the applicant(s).

ii) The monthly bank statement of the said account shall be submitted regularly to both the I.O. and the Trial Court during the pendency of the trial.

iii) The Reserve Bank of India may also be directed to issue an advisory/circular r