[2025:RJ-JD:50159]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11940/2025 Kesha S/o Sh. Dhanna, Aged About 76 Years, Resident Of Laku Kaleva, Police Station - Lasadiya, District - Salumber At Present Virya,police Station Kanod, District - Udaipur Rajasthan. At Present Lodged In Central Jail Udaipur ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10839/2025 Gopal S/o Lachchhi Ram, Aged About 37 Years, Teliyo Ka Mohalla Dungala Thana Dungala District Chhitorgarh (At Present Lodged At Jail Udaipur)

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11941/2025 Narayan Lal S/o Sh. Madhulal, Aged About 68 Years, Borkheda, Ps Badi Sadri, Dist. Chittorgarh, Raj. (Lodged In Central Jail Udaipur)

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11942/2025 Kailash Chandra S/o Mahaveer, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Potla, Thana Gangapur, District Bhilwara (Lodged In Central Jail Udaipur)

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. RS Rathore Mr. Ojas Shakdwipeeya Mr. Ansural Hak Mr.Kapil Purohit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hanuman Prajapati,PP

Order

20/11/2025

1. The instant bail applications have been filed by the applicants Kesha S/o Shree Dhanna, Gopal S/o Lachchhi Ram, Narayan Lal S/o Madhulal and Kailash Chandra S/o Mahaveer under Section 483 BNSS against the order impugned passed by learned court below in connection with FIR No.87/2025 registered at Police Station Kanod District Udaipur for the offence(s) under Section 8/20 & 29 of NDPS Act.

2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the case. He further submits that plants of contraband Ganja have been recovered from the applicant. Learned counsel submits that as per Section 20(a)(i) of NDPS Act, maximum punishment is ten years in which there is no any details mentioned regarding below commercial and commercial quantity. The provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act are not attracted in the matter. Learned counsel for the applicants further submits that the applicants are behind the bars and trial may take long time to conclude thus, they deserve to be enlarged on bail.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.

4. Considering the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case, keeping in view the provisions of Section 20(a)(i) NDPS Act, without commenting on the merits and demerits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the applicants on bail.

5. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-applicants shall be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid FIR provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Lower Court for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

92-95-Arti/-