HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
SURESH @ KAKU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 12944 / 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:53797]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12944/2025
1. Suresh @ Kaku S/o Ramchandra, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Near Pratap Nagar Rain Basera, Police Station, Pratapnagar, District Udaipur
2. Sunil Kumar @ Dhuna S/o Ramchandra, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Near Pratap Nagarrain Basera, Police Station, Pratapnagar, Districtudaipur. At Present Near Gitanjali Hospital, Police Station, Savina, District Udaipur
3. Ranjit @ Ranjeet S/o Pappu, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Near Pratap Nagar Rain Basera,police Station, Pratapnagar, District Udaipur
4. Karan S/o Shyamlal, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Near Pratap Nagar Rain Basera, Police Station, Pratapnagar, District Udaipur (At Present Lodged In Jail Udaipur)
----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Kumar Acharya For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sonu Manawat, PP Mr. Gopal Singh Bhati for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
Order
11/12/2025 The instant application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS (439 of Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioners who have been arrested in the present matter. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below:
S. No. Particulars of the case
1. FIR Number 360/2025
2. Police Station Savina
3. District Udaipur
4. Offences alleged in the Under Sections 191(2), 191(3), FIR 190, 115(2), 109(1), 332(c) &
324(4) of BNS
5. Offences added, if any Under Section 192(2) of BNS Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioners has drawn attention of this Court towards the injury report of injured persons and submitted that all the injuries received by the injured persons are simple in nature except two injuries of Nathulal, which are serious in nature but not dangerous to life. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the charge-sheet has already been filed, petitioners are in judicial custody since 27.09.2025 and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioners.
Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application but they do not refute the fact that all the injuries received by the injured persons are simple in nature except two injuries of Nathulal, which are serious in nature but not dangerous to life.
Having heard and considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case as well as perused the material available on record, considering the injury report of the injured persons, considering the fact that charge-sheet has already been filed, petitioners are in judicial custody since 27.09.2025 and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail.
Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS (439 of Cr.P.C.) is allowed. It is ordered that the accused- petitioners as named in the cause title, arrested in connection with the above mentioned FIR, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for their appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J
189-Ramesh/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.