[2025:RJ-JD:53674]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14551/2025 Ramesh Kumar S/o Shri Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Bhanwar, P.s. Sedwa, District Barmer. (At Present Lodged In District Jail Barmer)

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. RJ Punia.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Surendra Bishnoi, PP.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT

Order

11/12/2025 The instant application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS (439 of Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in the present matter. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below:

S. No. Particulars of the case

1. FIR Number 180/2025

2. Police Station Dhorimanna

3. District Barmer

4. Offences alleged in the Under Sections 191(2), FIR 191(3), 190, 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 331(6) and 307 of the BNS.

5. Offences added, if any Under Sections 118(2) and

3(5) of the BNS.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is contended that as per the FIR, the initial allegation was levelled against one Jay Ram, however, in the statement recorded under Section 180 of the BNSS, the injured has improved his version and shifted the allegation towards the present petitioner. Learned counsel further submits that as per the injury report, Injury No.1 has been shown as grievous in nature, while all the remaining injuries are simple in nature.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the charge-sheet has already been filed, the petitioner is in custody since 01.08.2025 and the trial is likely to take a sufficiently long time to conclude, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application and submits that although the injuries are not dangerous to life, the allegation against the petitioner of inflicting injury resulting in severing of nose of the complainant, which constitutes a heinous offence, therefore, the benefit of bail may not be granted to the present petitioner.

Having heard and considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case as well as perused the material available on record; considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since long 01.08.2025 and the trial will take sufficiently long time to conclude, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS (439 of Cr.P.C.) is allowed. It is ordered that the accused- petitioner as named in the cause title, arrested in connection with the above mentioned FIR, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for his appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.

(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J

98-/Jitender//-