[2025:RJ-JP:47361]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14073/2025 Rajmal S/o Shri Devilal, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Pachiplya, P.S. Mantown, Sawaimadhopur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Sawaimadhopur).

----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Ms. Sunita Mehla, Adv. (RSLSA)

For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

Order

24/11/2025

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No.309/2025 registered at Police Station Mantown District Sawaimadhopur for the offence(s) under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 61(2)(a) of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that applicant is a young person, aged about 22 years, having no criminal antecedents. It is further submitted that FIR in the instant matter has been lodged by the police authorities. It is also submitted that the matter at hand is triable by the First Class Magistrate. Moreover, it has been submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed in the matter and trial will take long time to conclude.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the instant bail application. It is submitted that the matter at hand pertains to cyber fraud and there are two criminal antecedents registered against the applicant on the National Cyber Crime Portal (Registered Number-1930). It is further submitted that cyber fraud amounting to the tune of approximately Rs.17 lacs is involved in the instant matter and there involves siphoning of money using mule accounts by the applicant, signifying the active participation of the applicant.

4. Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that applicant is a young person, aged about 22 years; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant; that the matter at hand is triable by the Magistrate; that the charge-sheet has already been filed and trial will take long time to conclude and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the instant bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail.

5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Rajmal S/o Shri Devilal shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

6. Taking note of the subject matter and place reliance upon the ratio and directions spelled out in SBCRLMB No. 9343/2025 titled as Mohit Vs. State of Raj. this Court is of the view that in addition to the condition as imposed, the following conditions are also to be abided by the applicant. For the sake of convenience the conditions imposed upon the applicant are reproduced herein below:-

"a. Banking Restrictions:

i) The financial transactions of the accused-applicant shall remain confined to one designated bank account, details of which shall be furnished to the Investigating Officer (I.O.) and the learned Trial Court, prior to release on bail. Moreover, if multiple accounts are operative in any Bank, under the name of the accused- applicant(s)/convicted person, the same shall be closed with immediate effect i.e. prior to release of the applicant(s).

ii) The monthly bank statement of the said account shall be submitted regularly to both the I.O. and the Trial Court during the pendency of the trial.

iii) The Reserve Bank of India may also be directed to issue an advisory/circular restraining the accused- applicant from opening any n