HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
SAMEER JAIN
RAHIL @ AANKDI S/O ALI MOHAMMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 14498 / 2025
[2025:RJ-JP:44892]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14498/2025 Rahil @ Aankdi S/o Ali Mohammad, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Bhandara Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Raj.) (Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In Sub Jail Deeg).
----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Manish Gupta with Mr. Vishvendra Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
10/11/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No.320/2025 registered at Police Station Jurhera District Deeg for the offence(s) under Sections
3/25 of Arms Act.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is approximately 30 years of age and is the sole bread earner of his family. It is submitted that the case under the Arms Act was registered against the applicant on account of his criminal antecedents and that the FIR has been lodged due to vindictiveness on the part of the police authorities. It is also submitted that the applicant has been in custody ever since
21.10.2025 and the trial is likely to take a long time.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.
4. Heard and considered.
5. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, the facts that the applicant is sole bread earner for his family; that the case under the Arms Act was registered against the applicant on account of his criminal antecedents; that FIR has been lodged due to vindictiveness on the part of the police authorities; that the applicant has been in custody ever since 21.10.2025; that trial will take a long time and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail. Howsoever, with the condition i.e. as an extended interpretation of the provisions of 'community service' as enshrined under the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, and as a reformative approach to re-include the accused- applicants back in the society with a better vision, aim and zeal in life, this court deems it fit to impose an ancillary condition upon the applicants, therefore, it is directed that the accused-applicant shall contribute to the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan – initiative of the government, for a period of one week from the date of enlarging on bail, on two hours per day basis, as an honorary work, under the supervision and directions of the SHO qua the FIR (Supra) in consonance with the directions of the Municipal Corporation/Local Administrative authorities concerned.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Rahil @ Aankdi S/o Ali Mohammad shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
(SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /211 Powerd by TCPDF (w.tcpdf.org)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.