Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ANOOP KUMAR DHAND, J
Kingsroad Handelsges M.B.H – Appellant
Versus
Raj Grow Impex LLP. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of jurisdiction and prayer for enforcement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details on contracts and arbitration history. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observations on arbitration process. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. discussion on public policy and enforcement criteria. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. clarification on standards for questioning foreign awards. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. confirming narrow public policy grounds for enforcement. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. need for strict adherence to export standards in arbitration. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 8. final summary on enforcement of foreign awards based on public policy. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 9. final conclusion and order on the enforcement of the award. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
Prelude:-
The classic idiom “Won the battle but lost the war” means achieving a small or temporary victory/success but ultimately failing to reach a larger, more important goal. It is often used to describe the situations where a short-term success or triumph is outweighed by a greater, long-term loss or failure.
After wining all the battles, one should not be left to feel as if he has lost the war. If someone achieves success by winning these battles, then he should not be l
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
