SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 14904

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
MASTER DAIVIK RANGWANI S/O SHRI TARUN RANGWANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Order

Reportable

For convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided in the following parts:-

INDEX

(1) Preface ……………..………………….……….…………….………...……2

(2) Facts of the case….………….…………………………….………………4

(3) Contentions of the petitioner…..………………..……….…………..5

(4) Contention of the respondents..……….……………………….…….6

(5) Analysis, Discussions & Findings…………….……………………….7

(6) Conclusion & Directions……..……………………………..………….12

Preface:-

Right to Education should help the student, not only to develop his capacities but also to understand his own highest interest.

a. The Right to Education falls under the hallowed walls of the fundamental right to live with dignity guaranteed under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution because education ensure a good and dignified life.

b. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Unni Krishnan J.P. & Ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. reported in 1993 (1) SCC 645 has held that Right to Education is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India for the children up to the age of fourteen years. Beyond the age of fourteen years, the Right to Education becomes subordinate to the economic means of the State and its development. The Directive Principles of State

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top