SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 14921

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MUNNURI LAXMAN
KAPIL AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW / 7948 / 2025



[2025:RJ-JD:29869]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7949/2025 M/s Surya Buildsquare Pvt. Ltd., having its Registered Address at 19-C, Old Fathpura, Udaipur, Rajasthan. through its Authorized Representative Jugal Kishore Agarwal S/o Shri Rampal Agarwal, Aged About 65 Years, Resident of 14-B, Agrasen Nagar, Udaipur, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State of Rajasthan, through its Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. Udaipur Development Authority, Udaipur, through its Commissioner.

3. Secretary, Udaipur Development Authority, Udaipur.

----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6790/2025 Nirmal Kumar Jain S/o Shobhag Mal Jain, Aged about 59 Years, Resident of Kundanam, Maheshwari Colony, Madanganj, Kishangarh, Ajmer, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. Udaipur Development Authority, Udaipur, through its Commissioner.

3. Secretary, Udaipur Development Authority, Udaipur.

4. Deputy Inspector General, Registration & Stamps, District Udaipur.

5. Sub-Registrar-I, Udaipur.

6. Sub-Registrar-II, Udaipur.

7. Tehsildar, Girwa, District Udaipur.

8. Tehsildar, Badgaon, District Udaipur.

9. Tehsildar, Kurabad, District Udaipur.

----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6815/2025

1. Sunita Malara W/o Lalit Malara, Aged about 53 Years, Resdient of 29 Bahubali Colony Bohra Ganesh Ji Road Udaipur Rajasthan

2. Lalit Malara S/o Kanhaiya Lal Malara, Aged about 58 Years, Resdient of 29 Bahubali Colony Bohra Ganesh Ji Road Udaipur Rajasthan ----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, through its Principal Secretary Urban Devleopment and Housing Department Government of Rajasthan Jaipur

2. Udaipur Development Authority, Udaipur through its Commissioner

3. Secretary, Udaipur Development Authority Udaipur

4. Deputy Inspector General, Registration and Stamp District Udaipur

5. Sub Registrar 1, Udaipur 6. Sub Registrar II, Udaipur

7. Tehsildar, Girwa District Udaipur

8. Tehsildar, Badgaon District Udaipur 9. Tehsildar, Kurabad District Udaipur ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7948/2025

1. Kapil Agarwal S/o Jagdish Prasad Agarwal, Aged about 41 Years, Resident of 19-C, Old Fatehpura, Udaipur, Rajasthan.

2. Ankit Agarwal S/o Jagdish Prasad Agarwal, Aged about 40 Years, Resident of 19-C, Old Fatehpura, Udaipur, Rajasthan.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, through its Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. Udaipur Development Authority, Udaipur, through its Commissioner.

3. Secretary, Udaipur Development Authority, Udaipur.

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Dr.Sachin Acharya, Sr. Adv. Assisted by Mr.Samyak Dalal, Adv.

Mr.J.S.Saluja, Adv.

Mr.Vedant Agrwal, Adv. Mr.Pranjul Mehta, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Mr.Vijay Purohit, Adv.

Mr.Ayush Gehlot for Mr.Rajesh Panwar, AAG Mr.Shubham Ojha, Adv.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNNURI LAXMAN

Judgment

Judgment Reserved on : 26/05/2025 Judgment Pronounced on : 29/08/2025 Corrected Judgment pursuant to the modification/ clarification application and the order dated 13.11.2025 passed in Misc. Application No.381/2025

1. This order disposes of S.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos.

7949/2025, 6790/2025, 6815/2025, and 7948/2025.

2. The challenge in all the writ petitions pertains to the orders dated 27.03.2025 passed by the Layout Plan Committee of the Udaipur Development Authority, whereby the layout permissions granted in favour of the petitioners in the year 2023 were cancelled. In some of the writ petitions, further notices were also issued pursuant to the cancellation of the layout plans, proposing the cancellation of allotments and lease deeds. In addition to the above reliefs, the petitioners have also challenged the directions issued by the Deputy Secretary, Department of Urban Development and Housing, vide letter dated 19.03.2025, to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top