SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 15088

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, SANDEEP TANEJA
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Appellant
Versus
RAJMAL KHATIK – Respondent


[2025:RJ-JD:34724-DB]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1064/2024

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Jaipur.

2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Chittorgarh.

----Appellants Versus Rajmal Khatik S/o Shri Shankar Lal Khatik, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village - Suraj Nagar, Post Lulas, Shahpura, District -

Bhilwara (Raj.). ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. I.R. Choudhary, AAG with Mr. Pawan Bharti For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pawan Singh HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA

Order

06/08/2025

1. Learned counsel for the appellant-State submits that the present controversy pertains to the allocation of bonus marks to the respondent for the work performed as a Data Entry Operator on a ‘Job Basis’ under the MGNREGA Scheme in the Panchayat Samiti from 15.11.2008 to 30.06.2010. He submits that for the LDC recruitment of 2013, the respondent’s claim for bonus marks based on job basis employment is not valid. He referred to Rule 273 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996, particularly proviso 2, which reads as under :-

“Provided also that in case of a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top