HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI,
SANDEEP TANEJA
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Appellant
Versus
RAJMAL KHATIK – Respondent
[2025:RJ-JD:34724-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1064/2024
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Jaipur.
2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Chittorgarh.
----Appellants Versus Rajmal Khatik S/o Shri Shankar Lal Khatik, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village - Suraj Nagar, Post Lulas, Shahpura, District -
Bhilwara (Raj.). ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. I.R. Choudhary, AAG with Mr. Pawan Bharti For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pawan Singh HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Order
06/08/2025
1. Learned counsel for the appellant-State submits that the present controversy pertains to the allocation of bonus marks to the respondent for the work performed as a Data Entry Operator on a ‘Job Basis’ under the MGNREGA Scheme in the Panchayat Samiti from 15.11.2008 to 30.06.2010. He submits that for the LDC recruitment of 2013, the respondent’s claim for bonus marks based on job basis employment is not valid. He referred to Rule 273 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996, particularly proviso 2, which reads as under :-
“Provided also that in case of a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.