[2025:RJ-JP:48917]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 4083/2018

Ñ".k flag iq= Jh Jo.k flag] mez 30 o"kZ] fuoklh VVsjk] rglhy

uhedkFkkuk] ftyk lhdj] jktLFkku

izkFkhZ@vihykFkhZ

---- cuke

fpjath yky dqEgkj iq= Jh eqjyh/kj iztkir] fuoklh xzke [kksjh]

1.

rglhy 'kkgiqjk] ftyk t;iqj ¼jkt-½

¼okgu pkyd o iathÑr ekfyd okgu eksVjlkbZfdy ua-

vkjts32&,e&6568½

;uw kbZVsM bf.M;k ba';ksjsal da-fy- tfj;s izcU/kd] dk;kZy; &

2.

Vhih,p ¼Dysc gc½] r`rh; eafty] 20 eksgu gkml] VªkaliksVZ uxj]

t;iqj ¼jkt-½

¼chek dEiuh okgu eksVjlkbZfdy ua- vkjts32&,e&6568½

chek ikWfylh ua- 140400@31@11@01@00005564] oS/krk fnukad

24-07-2011 ls 23-07-2012 rd

vizkFkhZx.k@jsLiksaMsaV~l

----

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Bhargava, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajeev Bhushan Bansal, Adv. with

Ms. Ritu Bansal, Adv.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

Order

01/12/2025

1- vihykFkhZ }kjk ;g vihy /kkjk&173 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e&1988 ds rgr U;k;ky; eksVj nq?kZVuk okn U;k;kf/kdj.k 'kkgiqjk] ftyk t;iqj ¼ftls vkxs ^fo}ku vf/kdj.k* ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ }kjk Dyse ;kfpdk la[;k&129@2013] Ñ".k flag cuke fpjath yky o vU; esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 30-04-2018 ¼ftls vkxs *vk{ksfir fu.kZ;* ds uke ls lca ksf/kr

fd;k tk,xk½ ds fo#) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

2- vihykFkhZ Ñ".k flga }kjk fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds le{k] Lo;a ds eksVj okgu nq?kZVuk esa vkgr gks tkus ds QyLo:i dqy 73]10]000@& #i;s

Dyse izkIr djus gsrq Dyse ;kfpdk izLrqr dh x;h FkhA fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk mDr Dyse ;kfpdk esa ;kph dks dqy 14]73]099@& #i;s dh {kfriwfrZ jkf’k e; C;kt 09 izfr’kr lkykuk dh nj ls fnyokbZ x;h gSA fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds mDr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ls O;fFkr gksdj gLrxr vihy] vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus grs q izLrqr dh x;h gSA

3- nkSjkus cgl fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dh ekfld vk; dh x.kuk 26 fnol dh etnwjh ds vk/kkj ij djrs gq, 3]510@& #i;s izfrekg fu/kkZfjr dh tkdj =qfV dkfjr dh x;h gS] tcfd vihykFkhZ dh vk; dh x.kuk 30 fnol dh etnwjh ds vk/kkj ij dh tkuh pkfg, FkhA oDr ?kVuk vihykFkhZ ,xzh ck;ksVsd b.MLVªht fy- jhdks ,fj;k vthrx<] lhdj esa xkMZ ¼pkSdhnkj½ dk dk;Z dj izfrekg 6]000@& #i;s dh vk; vftZr djrk FkkA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd nq?kZVuk esa vihykFkhZ ds flj esa vfLFkHkax dh pksV dkfjr gksus ls mlds nksuksa vka[kksa dh jks'kuh pyh x;h rFkk 'kjhj ds vU; Hkkxksa ij xaHkhj pksVsa dkfjr gqbZ] ftuds QyLo:i vihykFkhZ ds 'kjhj ij dqy 100 izfr'kr LFkk;h fu;ksZX;rk vkuk ik;k x;k gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk ;krk;kr o ifjogu dh en esa] ikSf"Vd vkgkj dh en esa o vU; enksa esa vR;f/kd de jkf'k fnyokbZ x;h gS rFkk Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh lq[k&lqfo/kk dh deh ds en esa] ifjpkjd@lgk;d dh en esa o Hkfo"; esa gksus okys bZykt dh en esa dksbZ leqfpr jkf'k ugha fnyokbZ gSA vr% vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy Lohdkj dh tkdj {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;hA

4- blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ chek dEiuh dh vksj ls mijksDr rdkZsa dk fojks/k djrs gq, fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds fu.kZ; dh iqf"V fd;s tkus rFkk vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls lafLFkr dh x;h vihy dks [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;hA

5- nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh x;hA vihy i=koyh o fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

6- eksVj nq?kZVuk esa vkgr O;fDr;ksa dks {kfriwfrZ fnyok;s tkus ds lna HkZ esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk vius U;kf;d n`"Vkar Anant Son of Sidheswar Dukre Vs. Pratap son of Zhampannappa Lamzane & Anr. Reported in (2018) 9 Supreme Court Cases

450, esa fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS tks fuEu izdkj ls gS %&

“12. In case of motor accidents leading to injuries and disablements, it is a well settled principle that a person must not only be compensated for his physical injury, but also for the non-pecuniary losses which he has suffered due to the injury. The claimant is entitled to be compensated for his inability to lead a full life, and enjoy those things and amenities which he would have enjoyed, but for the injuries."

"13. The purpose of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act is to fully and