[2025:RJ-JP:51826]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 4647/2008

1- Jherh pesyh nsoh iRuh Jh nqxkZ izlkn O;kl] vk;q 61 o"kZ] fuoklh

IykWV ua- 10&11] egs'k dkWyksuh&11] txriqjk] t;iqjA

&&vihykfFkZ;k

fo:)

1- enu yky iq= Jh HkS:jke] fuoklh edku ua- 405] foosd fogkj dkWyksuh] U;w lkaxkusj jksM]+ t;iqjA ¼pkyd LdwVh l[a ;k

vkj-ts-&20&1,e&0008½

2- vkuUn izdk'k iq= vks-ih-tks'kh] fuoklh e-ua- ,lch&28] lUrksdck nqyZHkth vLirky ds lkeus] t;iqjA ¼Lokeh&gks.Mk LdwVh l[a ;k

vkj-ts-&29&Vh&0321½

3- ;wukbZVsM bf.M;k bU';ksjsUl da-fy-] t;iqj ¼chek diuh gks.Mk LdwVh

la[;k vkj-ts-&20&1,e&0008½

&&izfroknhx.k

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ram Sharan Sharma, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajay Kumar Tanenia, Adv. (For

Insurance Company)

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

Order

08/12/2025

1- vihykfFkZ;k Jherh pesyh nsoh }kjk ;g vihy /kkjk 173 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e&1988 ds rgr U;k;ky; eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k ,oa jktLFkku jkT; lgdkjh vf/kfu;e] t;iqj ¼ftls vkxs ^fo}ku vf/kdj.k* ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ }kjk Dyse ;kfpdk l[a ;k&40@2005] Jherh pesyh cuke enuyky oxSjk esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 14-09-2004 ds fo#)

izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

2- vihykfFkZ;k Jherh pesyh nsoh }kjk fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds le{k] Lo;a ds eksVj okgu nq?kZVuk esa vkgr gks tkus ds QyLo:i dqy 6]23]000@& #i;s Dyse izkIr djus gsrq Dyse ;kfpdk izLrqr dh x;h FkhA fo}ku

vf/kdj.k }kjk mDr Dyse ;kfpdk esa vihykfFkZ;k dks dqy 70]000@& #i;s dh {kfriwfrZ jkf’k e; C;kt 6 izfr’kr lkykuk C;kt dh nj ls fnyokbZ x;h gSA fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds mDr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ls O;fFkr gksdj gLrxr vihy] vihykfFkZ;k dh vksj ls {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus gsrq izLrqr dh x;h gSA

3- nkSjkus cgl fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykfFkZ;k dk rdZ jgk fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykfFkZ;k dks vk; dh {kfr dh en esa dksbZ Hkh {kfriwfrZ jkf’k ugha fnyokbZ tkdj =qfV dkfjr dh xbZ gS] tcfd vihykfFkZ;k oDr ?kVuk x`g dk;Z dj viuk thou ;kiu djrh Fkh rFkk mldh dksbZ fuf'pr vk; ugha Fkh] fdUrq ftu O;fDr;ksa dh dksbZ fuf'pr vk; ugha gks] mudh vk; U;wure etnwjh ds vk/kkj ij fu/kkZfjr dh tkuh pkfg, FkhA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykfFkZ;k dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk Hkfo"; dh izR;k'kk dh en esa] 'kkjhfjd o ekufld ihMk+ dh en esa rFkk Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh lq[k&lqfo/kk dh deh ds en esa Hkh leqfpr jkf'k ugha fnyokbZ gS rFkk vU; enksa esa Hkh vR;f/kd de jkf'k fnyokbZ x;h gS] ftuesa c<+ksrjh dh tkosA vr% vihykfFkZ;k dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy Lohdkj dh tkdj {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;hA

4- blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ chek dEiuh dh vksj ls vihykfFkZ;k ds mijksDr rdksZa dk fojks/k djrs gq, fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk ikfjr fd;s x;s fu.kZ; dh iqf"V fd;s tkus rFkk vihykfFkZ;k dh vksj ls lafLFkr dh x;h vihy dks fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

5- nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh x;hA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

6- gLrxr ekeys dh nq?kZVuk esa vihykfFkZ;k dks dkfjr gqbZ pksVksa ds QyLOk:i mlds 'kjhj ij dqy 40 izfr'kr dh LFkkbZ fu;ksZX;rk vkuk ik;k x;k gSA eksVj nq?kZVuk esa vkgr O;fDr;ksa dks {kfriwfrZ fnyok;s tkus ds lanHkZ esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk vius U;kf;d n`"Vkar Anant Son of Sidheswar Dukre Vs. Pratap son of Zhampannappa Lamzane & Anr. Reported in (2018) 9 Supreme Court Cases

450, esa fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS tks fuEu izdkj ls gS %&

“12. In case of motor accidents leading to injuries and disablements, it is a well settled principle that a person must not only be compensated for his physical injury, but also for the non-pecuniary losses which he has suffered due to the injury. The claimant is entitled to be compensated for his inability to lead a full life, and enjoy those things and amenities which he would have enjoyed, but for the injuries."

"13. The purpose of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act is to fully and adequately restore the aggrieved to the position prior to the accident. This Court in Yadava Kumar v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. explained “just compensation” in the following words:"

"15. It goes without saying that in matters of determination of compensation both the tribunal and the court ar