SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 15401

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
SITARAM NARANIYA S/O SHRI CHHOTURAM NARANIYA – Appellant
Versus
SOHANLAL S/O SHRI GOPICHAND – Respondent
CMA / 2080 / 2022



[2025:RJ-JP:51866]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2080/2022

lhrkjke ukjkf.k;k iq= Jh NksVwjke ukjkf.k;k] vk;q 55 o"kZ] fuoklh& 34]

';ke fogkj dkWyksuh] ';ksiqj] iqfyl Fkkuk lkaxkusj] t;iqj ¼jkt-½

izkFkhZ@vihykFkhZ

---- cuke

lksguyky iq= Jh xksihpUn] fuoklh& 33@180@143] izrki uxj

1.

lSDVj&3] lkaxkusj] t;iqj ¼jkt-½

¼pkyd ,oa lqiqnZnkj okgu dkj uEcj vkj-ts&14&lh-,&8073½

ukFkwyky 'kekZ iq= Jh jkes'oj izlkn 'kekZ] fuoklh&ygkfu;k dk

2.

eksgYyk] dkuksrk] rglhy cLlh] ftyk t;iqjA

¼iathÑr Lokeh okgu dkj uEcj vkj-ts&14&lh-,&8073½

,p-Mh-,Q-lh- ,xksZ tujy ba';ksjsUl dEiuh fyfeVsM] tfj;s

3.

izca/kd] dk;kZy;& vfgalk lfdZy] lh&Ldhe] iqfyl Fkkuk v'kksd

uxj] t;iqjA

¼chek dEiuh okgu dkj uEcj vkj-ts&14&lh-,&8073½

vizkFkhZx.k

----

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Bhanu Prakash Verma, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Virendra Agrawal, Adv.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

Order

08/12/2025

1- vihykFkhZ }kjk ;g vihy /kkjk 173 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e&1988 ds rgr U;k;ky; eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k ¼fof'k"B U;k;ky;] lk-na-iz-½] t;iqj egkuxj] t;iqj ¼ftls vkxs ^fo}ku vf/kdj.k* ds uke ls lca ksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ }kjk Dyse ;kfpdk la[;k&1015@2017] lhrkjke cuke lksguyky o vU; esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 21-04-2022 ¼ftls vkxs ^vk{ksfir

fu.kZ;^ ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ ds fo#) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

2- vihykFkhZ lhrkjke }kjk fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds le{k] eksVj okgu nq?kZVuk esa Lo;a ds vkgr gks tkus ds QyLo:i dqy 25]40]000@& #i;s Dyse izkIr djus grs q Dyse ;kfpdk izLrqr dh x;h FkhA fo}ku

vf/kdj.k }kjk mDr Dyse ;kfpdk dk fuLrkj.k djrs gq, ;kph dks dqy 4]77]775@& #i;s dh {kfriwfrZ jkf'k e; C;kt 06 izfr'kr lkykuk dh nj ls fnyokbZ x;h gSA mDr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ls O;fFkr gksdj gLrxr vihy] vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus gsrq izLrqr dh x;h gSA

3- nkSjkus cgl fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dh ekfld vk; dh x.kuk 26 fnol dh etnwjh ds vk/kkj ij djrs gq, 5]382@& #i;s izfrekg fu/kkZfjr dh tkdj =qfV dkfjr dh x;h gSA tcfd vihykFkhZ dh vk; dh x.kuk 30 fnol dh etnwjh ds vk/kkj ij dh tkuh pkfg, FkhA oDr ?kVuk vihykFkhZ ehV dh nqdku dk O;olk; dj 20]000@& #i;s izfrekg vk; vftZr djrk FkkA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd ekeys dh nq?kZVuk esa vihykFkhZ ds fofHkUu Hkkxksa esa pksVsa dkfjr gqbZ rFkk vihykFkhZ ds nk,sa iSj esa vfLHkHkax dh xaHkhj pksV dkfjr gqbZ gS] ftuds lkewfgd izHkko ls vihykFkhZ ds 'kjhj ij dqy 29-52 izfr'kr LFkk;h fu;ksZX;rk vkuk ik;k x;k gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dh fu/kkZfjr vk; ij Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh c<+ksrjh ds en esa dksbZ Hkfo"; o`f) ugha dh x;h gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh lq[k&lqfo/kk dh deh ds en esa dksbZ jkf'k ugha fnyokbZ xbZ gS rFkk 'kkjhfjd o ekufld ihMk+ dh en esa o vU; enksa esa Hkh vR;f/kd de jkf'k fnyokbZ x;h gS] ftuesa c<+ksrjh dh tkosA vr% vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy Lohdkj dh tkdj {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;hA

4- blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ chek dEiuh dh vksj ls mijksDr rdkZsa dk fojks/k djrs gq, fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds fu.kZ; dh iqf"V fd;s tkus rFkk vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls lafLFkr dh x;h vihy dks [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;hA

5- nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh x;hA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

6- ekeys dh nq?kZVuk esa vihykFkhZ dks dkfjr gqbZ pksVksa ds QyLo:i vihykFkhZ ds 'kjhj ij dqy 29-52 izfr'kr LFkk;h fu;ksZX;rk vkuk ik;k x;k gSA eksVj nq?kZVuk esa vkgr O;fDr;ksa dks {kfriwfrZ fnyok;s tkus ds lna HkZ esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk vius U;kf;d n`"Vkar Anant Son of Sidheswar Dukre Vs. Pratap son of Zhampannappa Lamzane & Anr. reported in (2018) 9 Supreme Court Cases

450, esa fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS tks fuEu izdkj ls gS %&

“12. In case of motor accidents leading to injuries and disablements, it is a well settled principle that a person must not only be compensated for his physical injury, but also for the non-pecuniary losses which he has suffered due to the injury. The claimant is entitled to be com

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top