SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 15507

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
VISHNARAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


[2025:RJ-JD:54328]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1606/2024

Vishnaram S/o Raghunath, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Godaro Ki

Dhani, Narayanpura, Ps Chakhu, Dist Phalodi, Raj.

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhagirath Ray Bishnoi

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Surendra Bishnoi, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT

Order

16/12/2025

The present criminal revision petition under Section 438/442

BNSS has been filed by the petitioner to assail the impugned order dated 26.09.2024 passed by learned Additional Session Judge, (Special Judge, NDPS Act Cases), Phalodi, whereby the application under Section 503 BNSS, moved by the petitioner for releasing/handing over the mobile phone i.e. Vivo V27 (8 GB/128 GB) bearing IMEI No.869657062205437 on ‘supurdgi’ has been

rejected.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that charge-sheet

in this case has already been presented and the mobile phone in question is unnecessarily lying in the police custody and the same may get damaged. Hence, it is prayed that the mobile phone in

question may be released on ‘Supardginama’.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, in supp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top