[2025:RJ-JP:51626]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20305/2025

Mukesh Kumar Paliwal S/o Shri Bhagwati Lal Paliwal, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Village Bhumlabas, Post Morath Via Sanwad, Tehsil

Mawli, District Udaipur (Rajasthan).

----Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Chief

Conservator Of Forest (Hoff) Rajasthan, Jaipur

(Rajasthan).

2. The Additional Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest

(Administration), Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Deputy Conservator Of Forest, Wildlife Chittorgarh,

District Chittorgarh (Rajasthan).

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya

For Respondent(s) :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN

Order

18/12/2025

1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the

following prayer:-

By issue appropriate, writ, order or direction the respondents may kindly be held the impugned action of the respondent for conducting DPC for promotion from the post of Forest Guard to Assistant Forester from the year 2020 on the basis of the separate seniority list for TSP and NON TSP category as illegal and arbitrary and further the respondent be directed to conduct to review DPC for

promotion on the post of Assistant Forester on the basis of common seniority list for TSP and NON TSP category and give promotion to the petitioner against the vacancy year 2019-20 as per his seniority with all consequential benefits including the arrears accrued thereof with interest and the respondents directed to modify the order of promotion qua the petitioner and rectify their year of promotion as 2019-20 and further the respondents be directed to revise the seniority as well as eligibility list for making promotion from the post of Assistant Forester accordingly.

2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances.

3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.

4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /517 Powerd by TCPDF (w.tcpdf.org)