SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 15908

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
MUKESH KUMAR PALIWAL S/O SHRI BHAGWATI LAL PALIWAL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


[2025:RJ-JP:51626]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20305/2025

Mukesh Kumar Paliwal S/o Shri Bhagwati Lal Paliwal, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Village Bhumlabas, Post Morath Via Sanwad, Tehsil

Mawli, District Udaipur (Rajasthan).

----Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Chief

Conservator Of Forest (Hoff) Rajasthan, Jaipur

(Rajasthan).

2. The Additional Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest

(Administration), Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Deputy Conservator Of Forest, Wildlife Chittorgarh,

District Chittorgarh (Rajasthan).

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya

For Respondent(s) :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN

Order

18/12/2025

1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the

following prayer:-

By issue appropriate, writ, order or direction the respondents may kindly be held the impugned action of the respondent for conducting DPC for promotion from the post of Forest Guard to Assistant Forester from the year 2020 on the basis of the separate seniority list for TSP and NON TSP category as illegal and arbitrary and further the respondent be directed to conduct to review DPC for

promotion on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top