SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 141

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
SUNIL BENIWAL
VIKRAM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF BARODA – Respondent


[2026:RJ-JD:3733]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1208/2026 Vikram Singh S/o Shri Ranveer Singh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Lakhina Bera, Nageshwar Nagar, Balrawa, District Jodhpur.

----Petitioner Versus

1. Bank Of Baroda, Through Its Branch Manager, Tinwari, District Jodhpur.

2. The Nodal Officer (Compliance And Legal Cell), Bank Of Baroda.

3. The Reserve Bank Of India (Rbi), Through Regional Manager, Reserve Bank Of India, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saddam Hussain For Respondent(s) : --

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL BENIWAL

Order

21/01/2026

1. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:-

“(i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any appropriate writ, order, or direction directing the respondent bank to immediately defreeze the petitioner’s Account No.40988100009995 with Bank of Baroda, Tinwari, District Jodhpur.

(Annexure-2)

(ii) Quash and set aside any internal or external communication purporting to freeze the said account as illegal, void and without jurisdiction;

(iii) By an appropriate writ, order, or direction, the respondent may ki

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top