SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 255

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
SANJEET PUROHIT
KAILASH CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
PRADEEP KUMAR – Respondent
CW / 21617 / 2025



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 21617/2025 Kailash Chandra S/o Parasram Ajmera, Aged About 68 Years, R/o Bazar No. 03, Bhopalganj, Bhilwara.

----Petitioner Versus Pradeep Kumar S/o Hardwarimal Poddar, R/o 12, Kamla Enclave, Chittor Raod, Bhilwara.

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Saruparia.

Mr. Nikhil Ajmera.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prasant Tatia.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT

Order

15/01/2026

1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner- tenant against the judgment dated 25.09.2025 passed by the Learned Appellate Rent Tribunal, Bhilwara in Rent Appeal No.06/2023, whereby the appeal filed by him has been rejected and the judgment dated 19.11.2022 passed by the learned Rent Tribunal, Bhilwara in Rent Case No.08/2014 allowing the application filed by the respondent – landlord under sections 6 & 9 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 has been affirmed.

2. After arguing for some time, when the Court expressed that there is no merit, learned counsel for the petitioner, instead of arguing the petition on merit, has confined his prayer to the extent of granting time to vacate the rented premise.

3. The writ petition, thus, stands dismissed as withdrawn, while granting time to the petitioner to vacate the rented premise by

30.06.2027, on the following conditions:-

(I) The petitioner shall personally submit an undertaking supported by his affidavit before the learned Rent Tribunal to the effect that on or before 30.06.2027, he shall hand over peaceful and vacant possession of the rented premises to the respondent. He shall also undertake neither to cause any damage to the subject premises, nor to make any alteration and not to assign, subject or in any manner part with possession to any other person and not to put the premise to any use other than the present use and not to cause any nuisance.

(ii) The arrears of rent, if any, shall be cleared within a period of two months from today.

(iii) The petitioner shall pay mesne profit of ₹7,500/- per month from the date of the judgment of the Appellate Rent tribunal i.e. 25.09.2025 on or before 7th day of each month in the bank account of the respondent (details of which shall be supplied by the respondent to the petitioner) till the vacant possession of the suit property is handed over i.e. by 30.06.2027. The arrears of mesne profit be paid by the petitioner-tenant to the landlord within two months from the date of this order.

4. It is made clear that upon petitioner’s failure to comply with any of the conditions aforesaid or violation of any terms of the undertaking, the respondent shall be entitled to execute the judgment passed by the Appellate Rent Tribunal forthwith, besides initiating proceedings for contempt of Court, in accordance with law.

5. No order as to cost.

6. The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

(SANJEET PUROHIT),J

34-sumer/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top