[2026:RJ-JP:1669]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

13763/2025

1. Kamla W/o Dhandholiram, aged about 66 years R/o Jhareda, Police Station Sadar Hindoncity, Dist. Karauli, Rajasthan.

2. Gudiya W/o Jaikumar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Jhareda, Police Station Sadar Hindoncity, Dist. Karauli, Rajasthan.

----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Asad Ul Haq Nooree For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Gupta, Addl.G.A. cum P.P.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Order

15/01/2026

1. The petitioners have filed this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.296/2025 registered with the Police Station Hindon Sadar, District Karauli for offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 352, 332(c) of B.N.S., 2023.

2. Heard.

3. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the factual report.

4. The First Information Report was registered on the Parcha Bayan of injured Manohari. The injured Manohari has sustained one grievous injury on parietal region. As per the contents of the F.I.R., there is no specific overt act assigned to the present petitioners as regards any of the injuries sustained by the injured Manohari. The petitioners are women and petitioners Kamla W/o Dhandholiram is aged about 66 years, therefore, they may be extended the benefit of anticipatory bail.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that the injured Manohari has sustained as many as five injuries, including sharp weapon injury.

6. As per the contents of the F.I.R., neither any specific overt act has been assigned to the present petitioners nor it was stated that what type of weapon was holding at the time of alleged incident.

7. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that the petitioners are women and there is no specific overt act assigned to them, this Court deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

8. Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Hindon Sadar, District Karauli in F.I.R. No. 296/2025 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners they shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to his satisfaction on the following conditions:-

(I). that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii). that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer, and (iii). that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court.

(GANESH RAM MEENAJ ARTI SHARMA /265