[2026:RJ-JP:1589]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 595/2026 Manoj Kumar S/o Sh. Bajrang Lal Boran, Aged 30 Years, R/o Village Shyampura (East), Police Station Ranoli, District Sikar.

(Accused Petitioner Is In Confinement At Central Jail Jaipur).

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Dudi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

Order

15/01/2026

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.09/2025 registered at Special Police Station (SOG), District ATS and SOG for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC and Sections 3, 4, 6, 2(f) (ii), 10 of Rajasthan Public Examination (Measure for Prevention of Unfair means in Recruitment) Act 2022.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that similarly placed co-accused Shilpa Vishnoi, Vibhishan, Ramlal Roj, Rakesh Kaswan and Sangeeta Vishnoi have already been enlarged on bail by this court and the co-ordinate Bench of this court. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time. The charge-

sheet has already been submitted before the concerned trial court, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that petitioner was involved in using unfair means in the examination of LDC conducted by Rajasthan High Court. It is alleged against the petitioner that he used blue- tooth device while taking the examination, therefore the bail application of the accused-petitioner deserves dismissal.

4. Heard and perused the material available on the record.

5. Considering the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time and similarly placed co-accused have been enlarged on bail. The charge-sheet has already been submitted before the concerned trial court, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Manoj Kumar S/o Sh. Bajrang Lal Boran, in connection with FIR No. 09/2025 registered at Special Police Station (SOG), District ATS and SOG shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The concerned trial Judge shall verify the address and contact details of the sureties through concerned SHO before releasing the accused-petitioner on bail.

7. The accused is directed to mark his presence on 25^th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station shall send the presence report of the accused petitioner on the same day to the trial court every month. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

8. The accused-petitioner is also directed to submit his present address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO within seven days of release and the concerned SHO shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number, he shall submit the same before the concerned SHO so also before the concerned learned trial court.

9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned SHO for its stri