HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
SAHIL ALIAS SAYAL ALIAS DHORA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 214 / 2026
[2026:RJ-JD:1219]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 214/2026 Sahil @ Sayal @ Dhora S/o Shri Nisar Mohammed, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Janta Colony, Mandore Road, Police Station Nagori Gate, Jodhpur (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Jodhpur)
----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Me. Aziz Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Surendra Bishnoi, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
Order
09/01/2026 The instant 2nd application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS (439 of Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in the present matter. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below:
The 1st bail application filed on behalf of the petitioner i.e.
S. No.
Particulars of the case
1.
FIR Number
136/2025
2.
Police Station
Nagori Gate
3.
District
Jodhpur City East
4.
Offences alleged in the FIR Under Sections 115(2),
126(2), 109(1) & 189(2) of BNS
5.
Offences added, if any
Under Section 3(5) of BNS
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.13289/2025 was dismissed as not pressed by this Court vide order dated 16.12.2025 with a liberty to the petitioner to file fresh bail application after filing of the charge-sheet. After rejection of 1st bail application, charge- sheet has been filed, hence, this 2nd bail application has been filed.
It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegations against the petitioner are of inflicting injury with an iron rod whereas as per the injury report, the injury has been caused with a sharp edged weapon and the same is opined as grievous. It is further submitted that as per the statement of injured, the knife injury was inflicted by Shahrukh alone. Learned counsel submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed, the petitioner is in judicial custody since 18.10.2025 and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.
Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application and submitted that looking to the allegation levelled against the petitioner, he may not be enlarged on bail.
Having heard and considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case as well as perused the material available on record; considering the statement of injured and the the fact that the injury has been caused with a sharp edged weapon i.e. knife and the same has been attributed to co-accused Shahrukh, charge-sheet has already been file and the conclusion of trial will take significant time, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
Consequently, the 2nd bail application under Section 483 of BNSS (439 of Cr.P.C.) is allowed. It is ordered that the accused- petitioner as named in the cause title, arrested in connection with the above mentioned FIR, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for his appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J
109-Ramesh/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.