[2026:RJ-JP:2615]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 314/2026 Deepak S/o Bhagwati Prasad, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Ram Nagar A Udei Mode, Police Station Udei Mode, Gangapur City, Presently Juniore Assistant Clerk (Record Keeper), Nagar Parishad Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur, Raj. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Gangapur City)

----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 478/2026 Ramprasad S/o Laxman, Aged About 72 Years, R/o Chak Chhawa, Police Station Gangapur City, The Then Patta Babu, Nagar Parishad, Gangpur City, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail Gangapur City).

----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sogarwal Dr. Mahesh Sharma Mr. Manish K Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP Mr. Pradeep Kumar Asthana, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Order

21/01/2026

1. These bail applications have been filed by the accused petitioners u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 335/2025, registered with the Police Station Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur for offences punishable u/S 338, 336(3), 336(4), 340(2), 318(2), 318(4), 319(2) and 61(2) of BNS.

2. Heard and considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioners as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the case diary.

3. The allegation against the accused petitioners is that in collusion with the other accused, they prepared the forged patta to grab the land of the complainant.

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the accused petitioners that the accused Deepak is the Storekeeper in the Municipal Council and the accused Ramprasad is Stenographer in that Council. He further submitted that the accused petitioners have been implicated in this case merely on suspicion. It is also submitted that the accused petitioners are in custody since 23.12.2025 and they are no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery and the offences alleged against them are triable by Magistrate.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that there is ample evidence collected during the investigation which shows the connection of the accused petitioners in preparing the forged documents.

6. The forged patta has been issued in the name of Asha Singhal and in that situation the petitioners cannot be said to be the beneficiaries, however they could be in collusion for preparing the forged patta. The accused petitioner are the employee and the offences alleged against them are triable by Magistrate and they are in custody since 23.12.2025, hence, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail.

7. Accordingly, these bail applications are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided that they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only)(each), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

8. A copy of this order be placed in connected file(s).

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /121-122