SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 795

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
KULDEEP MATHUR
PUROSHOTTAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


[2026:RJ-JD:3071]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 10751/2025 Puroshottam S/o Sohan, Aged About 45 Years, Village Khudala Falna District Pali ----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

2. Amritlal S/o Harbhajan Vaghela, Village Desuri District Pali ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshay Singh Rajpurohit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hanuman Ram Prajapati, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

ORDER

19/01/2026

1. By way of filing the present criminal misc. petition under Section 528 BNSS, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-

“It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that this misc. petition may kindly be allowed and impugned order dated 02.08.2025 passed by the learned court below may kindly be quashed and set aside along with the proceedings in the criminal case no.267/2013. ...”

2. The brief facts giving rise to the present petition are that the counsel representing the petitioner before the learned trial court expired during the course of trial. On account of the said circumstance, the complete cross-examination of witnesses namely Premkumar (P.W.3) and Munnala (P.W.4) could not be recorded, as th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top