SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 818

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
SANJEET PUROHIT
PRAMILA – Appellant
Versus
MUKESH KUMAR – Respondent


[2026:RJ-JD:3266]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16892/2023 Pramila W/o Nitin Kumar Srivastava, Aged About 42 Years, 1St Floor, House No. 46, C-Block, Sri Ganganagar ----Petitioner Versus Mukesh Kumar S/o Banwari Lal Parnami, House No. 205, Street No. 5, Indra Colony, Sri Ganganagar ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dixit Panwar for Mr. Rakesh Matoria.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dishant Verma. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT

Order

19/01/2026

1. The present writ petition is filed challenging the order dated 02.08.2023 passed by Learned Rent Tribunal, Sri Ganganagar, rejecting the application of the petitioner-tenant under Order VII Rule 11 read with Section 151 CPC.

2. Explaining the background facts, counsel for the petitioner- tenant stated that one Late Smt. Darshna Devi filed eviction petition bearing Rent Case No. 24/2021, against the petitioner- tenant on the ground of bonafide necessity as well as requirement of repair and maintenance in the premises in question. She was expired on 05.07.2021 and respondent Mukesh Kumar, being her son, has been impleaded as her legal representative and continued the said eviction petition.

Later

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top