SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 869

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
CHOTA RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


[2026:RJ-JD:2864]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 657/2026 Chota Ram S/o Birbal Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Kerlanada, police Station Matoda, district Phalodi Rajasthan (Lodged In District Jail, Phalodi)

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. B.Ray Bishnoi.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Surendra Bishnoi, PP.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT

Order

16/01/2026 This application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS (439 Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in the present matter. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below:

S. No. Particulars of the case
1. FIR Number 069/2025
2. Police Station Matora
3. District Phalodi
4. Offences alleged in the FIR Under Sections 8 & 15 of NDPS Act.
5. Offences added, if any Under Section 29 of NDPS Act
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that as per the NDPS Act, the commercial quantity of narcotic contraband viz. Poppy Husk is 50 kg, however, allegedly recover

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top