[2026:RJ-JD:1891]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15132/2025

1. Anil Alias Anu S/o Nathu Ji Parmar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Pipola Thana Pahada District Udaipur. (At Present Lodged In District Jail Dungarpur)

2. Praveen S/o Daya Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Pipola Thana Pahada District Udaipur. (At Present Lodged In District Jail Dungarpur)

3. Ashish S/o Mani Lal Parmar, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Pipola Thana Pahada District Udaipur. (At Present Lodged In District Jail Dungarpur)

4. Roshan S/o Nan Ji Parmar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Pipola Thana Pahada District Udaipur. (At Present Lodged In District Jail Dungarpur)

----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP.

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Ojha For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sonu Manawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

13/01/2026

1. This bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. (439 of Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioners who have been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.130/2025 registered at Police Station Pahada, District Udaipur, for offences under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2) and 103(1) of the BNS.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. Drawing attention of this Court towards the FIR, challan papers and the statements of deceased – Ramesh Kumar and eye witness of the incident, namely, Ajay Kumar recorded by the SHO, Police Station Pahada, District Udaipur, learned counsel submitted that in the present case, specific allegation of causing fatal injury in the abdomen of the deceased with sharp weapon (knife) has been levelled against the co-accused Dilkhush. Learned counsel submitted that the sharp weapon (knife) used in commission of the alleged crime has been recovered at the instance of co-

accused Dilkhush.

3. Lastly, learned counsel submitted that the petitioners are in judicial custody; the investigation against the petitioners has already been concluded; the petitioners do not have any criminal antecedent and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-

petitioners.

4. Per Contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. However, he was not in a position to refute the fact that the deceased and the eye witness of the alleged incident in their statements recorded by the Police, have clearly stated that the fatal injury was caused to the deceased by the co-accused Dilkhush with a sharp weapon (knife).

5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

6. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

7. Consequently, this bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. (439 of Cr.P.C.) is allowed. It is ordered that the accused- petitioners, namely, (i) Anil Alias Anu S/o Nathu Ji Parmar, (ii) Praveen S/o Daya Ram (iii) Ashish S/o Mani Lal Parmar and (iv) Roshan S/o Nan Ji Parmar arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.130/2025 registered at Police Station Pahada, District Udaipur, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial Court, for their appearance before that Court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.

8. It is however, made clear that findings recorded/observations made above are for limited purposes of adjudication of bail application. The trial Court shall not get prejudiced by the same.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J

84-Dinesh/C16/-