Appointment to Higher Post on Compassionate Grounds Not a Matter of Right: J&K&L High Court
07 Mar 2026
Nearly Decade-Long Delay in Patnitop Illegal Construction PIL Appalls J&K&L High Court; Directs PDA CEO to Join Proceedings
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Employees Under CCS Pension Rules Excluded from PG Act Section 2(e) Gratuity: Delhi HC Upholds Forfeiture on Resignation
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Orders No-Fault Vaccine Compensation Policy
11 Mar 2026
Maintenance to Wife Should Not Encourage Idleness or Be Excessive: Gujarat HC Reduces Family Court Enhancement under CrPC Ss.125,127
11 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MANEESH SHARMA
POKAR – Appellant
Versus
SHYORAM S/O SHOLA (DECEASED) – Respondent
[2026:RJ-JP:1313]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18090/2025
1. Pokar, S/o Shola
2. Ramadevi W/o Pokar, R/o Thakursikabas, Tehsil Jobner, District Jaipur ----Petitioners Versus
1. Shyoram S/o Shola (Deceased) through legal heirs
1/1. Patasi D/o Shyoram W/o Gopallal, R/o Thakursikabas, Tehsil Jobner District Jaipur
1/2. Kailash S/o Shyoram, 1/3. Rajendra S/o Shyoram, Both R/o Thakursikabas, Tehsil Jobner District Jaipur
1/4. Anju D/o Shyoram W/o Rajkumar, R/o Thakursikabas, Presently R/o Harnathpura, Tehsil Jobner District Jaipur
1/5. Manju S/o Shyoram W/o Jagdish, R/o Thakursikabas, at present R/o Harnathpura, Tehsil Jobner, District Jaipur
1/6. Smt. Gulli Devi W/o Shyoram, R/o Thakursikabas, Tehsil Jobner, District Jaipur
Mutation entries do not confer title and are only for fiscal purposes; disputes over title must be resolved in civil court.
A revisional court's proper exercise of jurisdiction cannot be arbitrarily changed once proceedings have been entertained, reinforcing the need for procedural fairness.
The court emphasized that once a legal revision is entertained, subsequent orders should not arbitrarily modify prior orders, maintaining the integrity of due process.
Revisions under the Rajasthan Tenancy Act are maintainable only against final decisions; interim orders do not constitute 'decided cases'.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article