[2026:RJ-JP:1172]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15673/2025 Ruzdar S/o Rasoola, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Village Nagla Shyam P.s. Nagar, District Deeg, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amir Aziz For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.K. Gupta, PP Mr. Naman Pareek HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Order

12/01/2026

1. This anticipatory bail application is filed by the accused petitioner u/S 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 262/2023 registered at Police Station Nagar, District Bharatpur for offences u/S 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B IPC.

2. Heard and considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.

3. The allegation against the accused petitioner is that he was the witness of a registered sale deed in favour of the complainant. It is alleged that the land which was purchased by the complainant by a registered sale deed was later on sold by Hariram to one Baljeet by a registered sale deed based on a forged power of attorney to which the accused petitioner is a part of conspiracy in preparing a forged power of attorney.

4. It has been brought to the notice of this Court by the counsel for the complainant that subsequent sale deed by Hariram in the name of Baljeet based on false and alleged power of attorney has been set aside by the civil Court by the judgment and decree.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as the counsel for the complainant vehemently opposed the bail application and submit that the accused petitioner has played an active role in preparation of forged power of attorney on the basis of which the land of the petitioner was sold by Hariram to Baljeet.

6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner and more particularly the fact that the registered sale deed based on alleged forged power of attorney to which the petitioner is also said to be a part of conspiracy, has already been set aside by the civil Court, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Nagar, District Bharatpur in FIR No. 262/2023 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) to his satisfaction on the following conditions:-

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without prior permission of the court.

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /196