[2026:RJ-JP:1025]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

17038/2025 Shailendra @ Shailu S/o Sh. Ramotar, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Samliyapura, Police Station Rajakheda, District Dholpur.

(Accused Presently Confined In District Jail Dholpur).

----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohammad Shahid Hassan For Complainant(s) : Mr. Ankur Singh Tomar For State : Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Order

12/01/2026

1. Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.440/2024 the Police Station Rajakheda, District Dholpur for offence under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 333, 109(1) & 352 of B.N.S., 2023.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the contents of the First Information Report, the only allegation against the accused-petitioner is of inflicting injury to injured Vijaypal on his hand by lathi blow. Learned counsel further submits that the injury sustained by the injured Vijapal is simple in nature. He also submits that the allegation of using firearm is not against the present accused-petitioner. He further submits that during trial qua other co-accused, the injured witness Vijaypal has been examined as PW2 and during his examination also, no specific overt act has been assigned to the present accused- petitioner. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody for last more than one month and trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore, the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as the learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application and submit that there are serious allegation against the accused-petitioner.

4. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.

5. Taking into consideration the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and so also the fact that the allegation against the accused-petitioner is of inflicting injury to one Vijaypal by lathi blow on his hand and the said injury is found to be simple in nature and the accused-petitioner is in custody for last more than one month, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

6. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /73