HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
GANESH RAM MEENA
SUSHIL KUMAR @ GANESH S/O BUDDHARAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 17193 / 2025
[2026:RJ-JP:1067]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
17193/2025 Sushil Kumar @ Ganesh S/o Buddharam, R/o Village Banshi Pahadpur, Police Station Rudawal, District Bharatpur (Raj.). The Accused Petitioner Presently In Judicial Custody Bayana.
----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Kumar Naharwal Adv. Indra Sharma Mr. Manoj Kumar Meena &
Mr. Vijaypal Sharma For Complainant(s) : Mr. Rakesh Saini Mr. Timan Singh For State : Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
12/01/2026
1. Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.434/2025 registered with the Police Station Rudawal, District Bharatpur for offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 351(2), 352, 324(4), 303(2) &
329(4) of B.N.S., 2023.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the allegation against the accused-petitioner is of inflicting injury to injured Pannalal, on his wrist joint, which has been opined to be grievous in nature. He also submits that the Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. He further submits that the accused-petitioner is said to be in custody since 05.12.2025 and trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the accused-
petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as the learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application and submit that there are specific allegations against the accused-petitioner of inflicting injury to one injured Pannalal and there is recovery of an axe at the instance of the petitioner.
4. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the challan papers.
5. On consideration of the submissions made at Bar and on perusal of challan papers, it is revealed that the allegations against the accused-petitioner is of inflicting injury to injured Pannalal on his wrist joint. The said injury is opined to be grievous in nature.
6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and so also the fact that the accused- petitioner is in custody since 05.12.2025 and the Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
7. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /78
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.