SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 1514

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
BAMBOO KHAN S/O SHRI SUPEDA @ SUFED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 392 / 2026



[2026:RJ-JP:1055]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 323/2026 Harun S/o Shami, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Baleta, Police Station Malakheda, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Alwar).

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 392/2026 Bamboo Khan S/o Shri Supeda @ Sufed, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Baleta, Police Station Malakheda, District Alwar (Rajasthan)

(At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Alwar).

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shiv Prakash Dhanera, Mr. Porush Sharma, Mr. Khanchand Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG, Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

Order

12/01/2026

1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.154-13/2025 registered Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 9, 27, 29, 31, 39, 50 and

51 of Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the similarly placed co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.16471/2025 and 16472/2025 dated 16.12.2025. The case of the petitioners are akin to the case of the other co-accused who have already been enlarged on bail. The offences alleged against the accused-petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioners are in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, these bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these bail applications.

4. Heard and perused the material available on record.

5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners and looking to the fact that the similarly placed co- accused have already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-

petitioners on bail.

6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Harun S/o Shami, and 2. Bamboo Khan S/o Shri Supeda @ Sufed, in connection with FIR No.154-13/2025 registered at Alwar, shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/140-141

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top