HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
KULDEEP MATHUR
BARKAT ALI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 13293 / 2025
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JD:5590]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13293/2025
Barkat Ali S/o Gulab Ali, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of
Karmali Ki Dhani Police Station Suratgarh Sadar District
Sriganganagar Rajasthan (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail
Suratgarh)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jaikishan Haniya
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hanuman Prajapati, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
30/01/2026
1. This application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS has been
filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with
F.I.R. No.04/2023 registered at Police Station Rajiyasar, District
Sriganganagar, for offences under Sections 8/15, 18, 25 and 29 of
the NDPS Act.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the
present case, contraband poppy husk/straw weighing 80 kilograms
and contraband opium weighing 320 grams were recovered from
the conscious and exclusive possession of the co-accused persons,
namely, Dinesh, Rohitash and Ram Kumar. It was further
submitted that the said co-accused persons, while in custody,
disclosed that the recovered contraband was intended to be
supplied to the present petitioner.
3. Learned counsel contended that except for the disclosure
statements of the co-accused persons, there is no direct or
(Uploaded on 30/01/2026 at 05:12:56 PM)
(Downloaded on 31/01/2026 at 07:43:08 AM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JD:5590] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13293/2025]
circumstantial evidence available on record to connect the
petitioner with the alleged offence. It was further submitted that
the co-accused persons, namely, Dinesh (S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail
Application No. 15692/2024), Rohitash (S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail
Application No. 4614/2024) and Ram Kumar (S.B. Cr. Misc.
Second Bail Application No. 13601/2024), have already been
enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 18.12.2024.
4. Lastly, learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is in
judicial custody; the investigation has already been completed and
the trial is likely to take a considerable time. On these grounds, he
prayed that the petitioner be enlarged on bail.
5. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed
the bail application and submitted that the petitioner is a habitual
offender and is presently facing trial in two other similar cases.
Therefore, considering the seriousness of the allegations, the
petitioner does not deserve the benefit of bail. However, learned
Public Prosecutor was not in a position to dispute that no
contraband was recovered from the conscious and exclusive
possession of the present petitioner and that the aforesaid co-
accused persons have already been enlarged on bail.
6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public
Prosecutor, and perused the material available on record.
7. Having considered the rival submissions and the facts and
circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on
the merits or demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge
the petitioner on bail.
8. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS
is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Barkat Ali
(Uploaded on 30/01/2026 at 05:12:56 PM)
(Downloaded on 31/01/2026 at 07:43:08 AM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JD:5590] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13293/2025]
S/o Gulab Ali arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.04/2023
registered at Police Station Rajiyasar, District Sriganganagar, shall
be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided she
furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of
Rs.50,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for his
appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and
whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.
9. It is however, made clear that findings recorded/observations
made above are for limited purposes of adjudication of bail
application. The trial court shall not get prejudiced by the same.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J
293-Dinesh/-
(Uploaded on 30/01/2026 at 05:12:56 P
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.