##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JD:5434]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 1133/2026

Sonu Bhambu S/o Kalu Ram, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of

Manakthedi Police Station Pilibanga District Hanumangarh

Rajasthan (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail Suratgarh)

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.R. Godara

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Surendra Bishnoi, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT

Order

30/01/2026

The instant second application for bail under Section 483 of

BNSS (439 of Cr.P.C.) has been filed on behalf of petitioner who

has been arrested in the present matter. The requisite details of

the matter are tabulated herein below:

S. No. Particulars of the case

1. FIR Number 295/2025

2. Police Station Sadul Shahar

3. District Sri Ganganagar

4. Offences alleged in the FIR Sections 3 & 25(6) of Arms

Act and Section 111(2)(a) of

IPC

5. Offences added, if any Section 111(2)(b) of IPC and

Sections 5, 25(7) & 25(1)(a)

of Arms Act

The first bail application of petitioner was dismissed as not

pressed vide order dated 13.11.2025 passed by this Court in

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.13084/2025, however,

liberty was granted to petitioner to file afresh application after

filing of the challan.

Now, challan has been filed. Hence the present bail

application.

(Uploaded on 30/01/2026 at 05:30:03 PM)

(Downloaded on 31/01/2026 at 07:51:46 AM)

[2026:RJ-JD:5434] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1133/2026]

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further

submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in the present

case on the basis of the statement of co-accused, Abhishek

Bhambu and the bail application was rejected by the learned trial

court on the ground of his criminal antecedents. Furthermore,

challan has already been filed and petitioner has been in custody

since 04.10.2025 and trial of case will take sufficiently long time,

therefore, benefit of bail may be granted to accused-petitioner.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed present

bail application and submits that the petitioner has as many as 15

criminal antecedents pending against him, therefore, it is urged

that he may not be enlarged on bail.

In response, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

the petitioner has already been enlarged on bail vide orders dated

25.11.2025 and 10.12.2025 passed in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail

Application Nos., 11974/2025, 14192/2025 and 13746/2025 by

this Court and a Coordinate Bench of this Court, in connection with

three of his previous criminal cases of similar nature.

Having heard and considered the rival submissions, facts and

circumstances of the case as well as perused material available on

record; considering the fact that challan has already been filed;

petitioner has been in custody since 04.10.2025 and trial of case

will take significant time; without expressing any opinion on

merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge

petitioner on bail.

(Uploaded on 30/01/2026 at 05:30:03 PM)

(Downloaded on 31/01/2026 at 07:51:46 AM)

[2026:RJ-JD:5434] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1133/2026]

Consequently, bail application under Section 483 of BNSS

(439 Cr.P.C.) is allowed. It is ordered that accused-petitioner as

named in the cause title, arrested in connection with above

mentioned FIR, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any

other case, provided he/she/they furnishes a personal bond of

Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each, to the

satisfaction of learned trial court, for his/her/their appearance

before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever

called upon to do so till completion of the trial.

In addition to the above, the petitioner is directed to appear

before the concerned Police Station in the first week of every

quarter of the year.

It is made clear that if the petitioner indulges in any similar

kind of criminal activity, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free

to file an app