HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MUNNURI LAXMAN
VIRENDER PRATAAP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW / 2006 / 2026
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JD:5551]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2006/2026
Virender Prataap Singh S/o Shri Umran Singh, Aged About 30
Years, R/o 78, Lane No. 12/3, New Bjs Colony, Paota C Road,
Dist. Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,
Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, Government
Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Joint Secretary, Medical And Health (Group-2)
Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. The Director (Public Health), Medical And Health Services,
Health Bhawan, Jaipur.
4. The District Collector Cum Chairman, Rajasthan Medicare
Relief Society, Pali.
5. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Pali (Raj.).
6. Block Chief Medical Officer, Rohet (Raj.).
7. In-Charge, Medical Officer, Community Health Center,
Dablirathan, District Pali (Raj.).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Raveena Dominic.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tanuj Jain for
Mr. Mukesh Dave, AGC.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNNURI LAXMAN
Order
30/01/2026
1. With the consent of both the parties, the matter is heard on
final disposal.
2. The present writ petition is filed challenging the action of the
respondents in not continuing the services of the petitioners
to the post of Medical Officer on Temporary Urgent Basis.
3. The petitioner was initially recruited to the post of Medical
Officer on Urgent Temporary Basis by way of contract and
the terms of contract clearly indicate that any such an
(Uploaded on 30/01/2026 at 02:34:42 PM)
(Downloaded on 31/01/2026 at 08:45:42 AM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JD:5551] (2 of 3) [CW-2006/2026]
appointments are made subject to one year or till the regular
appointments are made, whichever is earlier. Subsequently,
by order dated 11.04.2025, the employment of the petitioner
was extended till 30.09.2025, and thereafter, there was no
extension order, therefore, he has filed the present writ
petition.
4. The case of the State is that the very contract is for an
engagement for one year or till the regular appointments are
made, whichever is earlier and their services were not
further extended for the reason that a regular recruitment to
the post of Medical Officer has already been done and
posted. Therefore, the petitioner has no vested right to
continue after the regular appointments are made to the
post of Medical Officer.
5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly submitted
that the engagement of Medical Officer through regular
recruitment is already done and they have no vested right to
seek continuation on such post, where the appointments are
made regularly; however, the respondents may
sympathetically consider their case for re-engagement on
the vacant post, which are unfilled with regular recruitment
and such a vacant post also be filled basing on the merit as
well as period of experience of the candidates, who were
being disengaged by virtue of regular appointments.
6. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that if the
respondent-Authority decided to fill-up any unfilled
vacancies, which are available after filling up of the regular
vacancies, the case for reengaging the persons may be
(Uploaded on 30/01/2026 at 02:34:42 PM)
(Downloaded on 31/01/2026 at 08:45:42 AM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JD:5551] (3 of 3) [CW-2006/2026]
considered sympathetically including the case of the
petitioner for re-engagement on the vacant/unfilled post
subject to merit and period of experience among the
candidates.
7. The terms of the contract clearly indicate that their
appointment is on Temporary Basis and for a fixed period or
happening of certain eventuality of regular appointments.
Since the very discontinuation is based on the regular
appointments, the petitioner has no vested right to continue
work on the post of Medical Officer for the reason that they
have appointed on Temporary Urgent Basis, however, when
the respondents seek to re-employ in the vacant post of
Medical Officer after regular recruitment, the case of the
petitioner or others are required to be considered
sympathetically.
8. In the above factual facts and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.