HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MUNNURI LAXMAN
PAWAN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW / 2344 / 2026
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JD:5589]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2344/2026
Pawan Kumar S/o Shri Prem Shankar Meena, Aged About 33
Years, R/o 208, Ganesh Ganj Ka Rasta, Ranodiya, Tehsil Pipalda,
District Kota At Present Working As Lab Assistant (Teacher)
Government Senior Secondary School, Banar, District Jodhpur.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Chief Electoral
Officer, Department Of Election, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Secondary Education Rajasthan,bikaner.
3. The District Education Officer, (Secondary Education),
District Jodhpur.
4. The Election Officer (Collector), District Jodhpur.
5. The Election Registration Officer S.d.m., (126),
Bhopalgarh, District Jodhpur, Raj.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh
Mr. Mahesh Chandra
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNNURI LAXMAN
Order
30/01/2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the
impugned orders dated 17.12.2025 (Annex.2) whereby the
petitioner has been appointed as ‘Booth Level Officer’ (BLO) for
polling booth Government Sr. Secondary School, Khohkhariya Left
Division, District Jodhpur, Bhag Sankhya 324, whereas the
petitioner is elector/voter of Ranodiya, District Kota. He further
submits that as per the instructions of the Election Commission of
India issued vide order dated 09.06.2025, a ‘Booth Level Officer’
(Uploaded on 30/01/2026 at 04:46:54 PM)
(Downloaded on 31/01/2026 at 08:53:28 AM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JD:5589] (2 of 4) [CW-2344/2026]
(BLO) should be a voter in the polling station where, he is deputed
as ‘Block Level Officer’ (BLO).
2. In this regard, certain guidelines have been issued by the
Election Commission of India which reads as follows:
“1.1 ERO to appoint a BLO for each part of an electoral
roll, under Section 13B(2) of the Representation of
the People At, 1950, amongst any Group C and
above regular serving employees of state/local
government enrolled as elector in that part.
1.2 In the absence of regular state/local government
employees, ERO may appoint BLO amongst
Anganwadi workers, Contract Teachers, or central
government employees. However, in such cases,
CEO shall obtain a non-availability certificate
(Annexure-I) singed by ERO and countersigned by
DEO.
1.3 In the absence of any employee of categories
mentioned above enrolled as an elector in that
part of electoral roll, ERO with the prior approval
of CEO, may appoint BLO amongst such categories
of employee working in the area covered by that
part of electoral roll.”
3. A reading of the above clause makes out that the employees
who are falling under Group-C category are required to be
appointed as Booth Level Officer in the booth in which such
employee is registered as an elector. If the officers of Group – C
are not available in the booth then they have to resort to any
other Anganwadi workers, contract teachers or Central
Government employees who are registered as voters in that
particular booth. If the above two category employees are not
found registered as elector in the booth, then any other person
(Uploaded on 30/01/2026 at 04:46:54 PM)
(Downloaded on 31/01/2026 at 08:53:28 AM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JD:5589] (3 of 4) [CW-2344/2026]
from any other areas can be appointed in that booth, even though
they are not registered as voters in that booth.
4. The petitioner’s claim is that there are employees who are
registered voters in the respective booth for which the petitioner
was appointed. In spite of availability of such employees, the
petitioner was appointed in the said booth and the appointment
order does not indicate that the categories of employees as
detailed in Clause 1.1 and 1.2 were not available so that the
petitioner could be appointed to the said booth though she is not a
registered voter in that booth.
5. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that
the petitioner’s case may be reconsidered in case any of the
employees referred in Clause 1.1 and 1.2 of the amended
Guidelines dated 05.06.2025 are available, they shall be appointed
as BLO instead of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.