SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 1709

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
SANJEET PUROHIT
OMPRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
SATISH KUMAR – Respondent


[2026:RJ-JD:5104]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1448/2024

1. Omprakash S/o Shri Heeraram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Chak 3A Chhoti, Near Tiny Tots School, Balaji Dham Road, Near Shivalik First Colony, Sri Ganganagar (Raj.)

2. Shanker Lal S/o Shri Heera Lal, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Chak 3A Chhoti, Near Tiny Tots School, Balaji Dham Road, Near Shivalik First Colony, Sri Ganganagar (Raj.)

----Appellants Versus

1. Satish Kumar S/o Shri Naresh Kumar, R/o 6-J-32, Jawahar Nagar, Sri Ganganagar (Raj.)

2. Amit Kumar S/o Shri Shyam Lal, R/o 31, Third Block, Purani Abadi, Sri Ganganagar (Raj.)

----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Kunal Bishnoi.

For Respondent(s) :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT

Order

28/01/2026

1. The present miscellaneous appeal has been filed challenging the order dated 19.02.2024 passed by the Court of Additional District Judge No. 2, Sri Ganganagar (“Learned Trial Court”), whereby the application filed by respondents-plaintiffs under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC was allowed and a temporary injunction was granted in their favour and against the appellants-

defendants.

2. Explaining the background facts, it is stated that a suit for s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top