##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JP:3714]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1583/2026

Ramjilal Meena S/o Shri Kalyan Meena, Address Village

Chhatarpura, Post Dantli, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Raj.)

(At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur).

----Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahesh Gupta

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP,

Mr. Deepak Sharma

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

Order

28/01/2026

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483

of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of

accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in

connection with FIR No.505/2022, registered at Police Station

Ramnagariya, District Jaipur (East) for the offence(s) under

Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, 504, 323 and 143 of IPC.

2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the

petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended

that initially the report was lodged under Sections 420, 467, 468,

471, 120-B, 504, 323 and 143 of IPC, however, the Police did not

submit the charge-sheet under Section 467, 468 and 471 of IPC

qua the petitioner. It is also contended that the accused-petitioner

(Uploaded on 30/01/2026 at 11:06:37 AM)

(Downloaded on 31/01/2026 at 11:46:39 AM)

[2026:RJ-JP:3714] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-1583/2026]

has not forged any documents and the land belong to the

petitioner and the petitioner has not cheated anyone and the

proceedings under Section 90-B which were initiated was later on

cancelled. It is further contended that no right was given to the

society to allot the pattas to the holders and the society S.S.

Developers on his own granted several pattas. It is argued that

another FIR Bearing No.74/2023 was also registered in the Police

Station Ramnagariya, District Jaipur City East and after

investigation the Police has submitted the final negative report

with the conclusion that the Developers has no right to allot any

pattas as the right vest with the land holders. It is also argued

that in the present case the investigation was done by four

Investigating Officer and the complainant in collusion with the

Police Officials has wrongly submitted the charge-sheet against

the petitioner and the other co-accused. It is further argued that

the civil litigation between the petitioner and the S.S. Developers

is pending since 2023, the accused-petitioner is in custody since

long and further trial of the case may take considerable time,

therefore, considering the aforesaid fact, the bail application of the

accused-petitioner may be allowed.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel

appearing on behalf of the complainant have vehemently opposed

the grant of bail application.

4. It is contended by learned counsel for the complainant that

the disputed land was sold by one Gulab and his wife to the

Developer Society and huge amount was given to Gulab and to

the present petitioner. The petitioner and the other co-accused

after receiving the amount has executed 'Pratiga Patra' and

(Uploaded on 30/01/2026 at 11:06:37 AM)

(Downloaded on 31/01/2026 at 11:46:39 AM)

[2026:RJ-JP:3714] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-1583/2026]

thereafter Mr. Prem Surana formed a society in the name of Shri

Narsingh Arcade (Shankar Vihar) and allotment letters were

issued to the family members of the petitioner and to the

petitioner himself. The act of the petitioner itself constitute offence

under Sections 467, 468, 471 of IPC. It is further contended that

the seven FIRs were also registered against the petitioner and the

other co-accused, therefore, considering the aforesaid facts, the

bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed.

5. Heard and perused material available on record.

6. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the

case. The Investigating Officer has submitted the charge-sheet

against the petitioner under Sections 420, 406, 384 and 120-B of

IPC and did not submit the charge-she