SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 1877

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
SUNIL BENIWAL
MUSKAN SOLANKI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


[2026:RJ-JD:4806]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1612/2026

1. Muskan Solanki D/o Laxman Ram Solanki, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Purani Bhakhari Bas, Jodhpur (Raj.).

2. Dixit Kumar S/o Shri Dilip Kumar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Shiv Sakti Nagar, Baori Kalan, District Jodhpur.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Director General Of Police, Police Directorate, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

2. Commissioner Of Police, Jodhpur, District Jodhpur (Raj.).

3. Station House Officer, Police Station Udaipur.

4. Hdfc Branch Nai Sadak, Hdfc Bank Ltd. 12 And 37, Stadium Shopping Centre Opposite Umaid Stadium, Jodhpur (Jodhpur Through Its Branch Manager).

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Khushboo Palasiya For Respondent(s) : --

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL BENIWAL

Order

27/01/2026

1. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:-

“i. (By the issuance of any appropriate writ, order or direction the impugned action of the respondent bank and the respondent investigation agency and unconstitutional, Consequently, the same may be quashed ,set aside and rendered null and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top