SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 1912

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
PRAMOD KUMAR KHOKHAR SON OF SHRI RAMNATH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLAS / 64 / 2026



[2026:RJ-JP:3402]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 64/2026 Pramod Kumar Khokhar Son Of Shri Ramnath, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Vinayakpuri Tan Raipur, Police Station Ranoli, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present Appellant Is Confined In District Jail Sikar)

----Appellant Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

2. Ranjeet Kataria Son Of Shri Bholuram, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Pani Ki Tanki Ke Pass Govati Rorad Palsana Police Station Ranoli, District Sikar (Raj.)

----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ramnath (father of the petitioner)

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

Order

24/01/2026

1. This criminal appeal under Section 14 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the SC/ST Act’) has been filed on behalf of the appellant being aggrieved with the order dated 19.12.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge, (S.C./S.T. Prevention of Atrocities Cases), Sikar (hereinafter to be referred as ‘trial court’) in FIR No. 247/2025 registered at Police Station Ranoli, District Sikar for the offence under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 140(3)of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(e), 3(2)

(va) of SC/ST Act, 1989 and Section 66 of IT Act, 2008, whereby the trial court has dismissed the bail application filed on behalf of the appellant.

2. Heard Mr. Ramnath (father of the petitioner) and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material on record.

3. None appears on behalf of the complainant despite service.

4. Mr. Ramnath (father of the petitioner) submits that the appellant has falsely been implicated in this case. He again submits that the appellant has not been named in the FIR. He further submits that none of the injuries have been specifically attributed to the present appellant. The appellant is in custody since 07.12.2025 without any criminal past. Therefore, the appeal presented by the present appellant may be allowed.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the appeal.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the appeal filed by the appellant under Section 14 of SC/ST Act.

7. Accordingly, this criminal appeal filed under Section 14 of SC/ST Act is allowed and order dated 19.12.2025 passed by the learned trial court is set aside. It is directed that appellant- Pramod Kumar Khokhar Son Of Shri Ramnath, shall be released on bail provided he shall execute a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/305

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top