HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
GANESH RAM MEENA
LALSHAH S/O AKBAR HUSSAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 17176 / 2025
[2026:RJ-JP:3395]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
17176/2025 Lalshah S/o Akbar Hussain, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Dhmukad, Police Station Kishangarhbas, Distt. Khairthal-Tijara, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused / Applicant Is Confined In District Court, Kishangarhbas).
----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aalam Shah (brother of the accused-petitioner)
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
24/01/2026
1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.454/2025 registered at Police Station Kishangarh Bas, District Khairthal- Tijara for offences under Sections 318(2), 318(4), 61(2) and
112(2) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66D of I.T. Act.
2. Brother of the accused petitioner appears before this Court and submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he is in custody since 31.10.2025. He further submits that Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the petitioner is no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery. He also submits that trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State opposed the bail application.
4. Considered the submissions made by the brother of the accused-petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.
5. Having regard to the submissions made on behalf of the accused-petitioner so also the fact that Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and he is in custody since 31.10.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. It has been brought to the notice of this Court that these accused-persons of particular areas, who are involved in the online fraud, after their release from a criminal case, will celebrate their release in public. Hence, taking into consideration the aforesaid aspect, a condition is imposed that the petitioner shall not celebrate his release in public and if he is found to be involved in celebrating his release in public, the State shall be at liberty to move the application for cancellation of his bail.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /58
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.