Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, ACJ., MANEESH SHARMA
Bimala Kumari D/o Shri Moola Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
CMCW No.431/2024 in SAW No.499/2024:-
Matter comes up on the misc. application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of delay of 548 days in filing the appeal.
For the reasons stated therein, the application is allowed.Delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
1. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matters are taken up on board for deciding these appeals finally.
2. The controversy involved in these appeals is identical and hence, are decided by a common order. For convenience, the facts are being taken from lead case bearing D.B. SAW No.152/2023.
3. Challenge in the appeal (D.B. SAW No.152/2023) is to the order dated 25.11.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge.
4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the learned Single Judge has clearly proceeded to decide the writ petition in the light of judgment passed in the Ganesh Narayanmali &
The court upheld the rejection of the petitioner's candidature as her MA (P.Ed) was not equivalent to the required M.P.Ed, confirming the necessity of adhering to specified qualifications in recruitm....
Denial of promotion based on accepted qualifications is arbitrary and violates principles of natural justice.
The main legal point established is that the qualifications of the petitioners, as per the Gazette Notification, aligned with the advertisement's requirements for the Trained Graduate Teacher positio....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and recognition of the B.P.Ed. qualification for the appointment of Assistant Teachers in a Primary School.
The institution offering the course is entitled to award the degree until the end of the academic session, and the recognition granted by the NCTE would relate back to the date of the institution's a....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article