SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 2085

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Farjand Ali, J
MOHAN LAL – Appellant
Versus
VED PRAKASH SHARMA – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 288/2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mayank Khatri
For the Respondents: Surendra Bishnoi, Nishit Shah

A conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act may be set aside and the accused acquitted if the parties reach an amicable settlement and the entire due amount is paid, as the offence is compoundable in nature.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a criminal revision petition under Section 438 read with Section 442 of the BNSS challenging the affirmation of a conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner had been sentenced to 11 months' simple imprisonment and ordered to pay compensation of Rs. 3,15,000. The court found that during the pendency of the petition, the parties reached an amicable settlement and the entire due amount was paid to the complainant. The primary issue was whether the conviction should be maintained after the full satisfaction of the claim. The court reasoned that since the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is compoundable in nature and the complainant expressed no objection to the compounding, continuing the conviction would serve no fruitful purpose. Accordingly, the instant criminal revision petition is allowed.

Table of Content
1. procedural history and background of the conviction under the negotiable instruments act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. amicable settlement and full payment of dues between the parties. (Para 4 , 5)
3. legal effect of compounding a compoundable offence under the negotiable instruments act. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. quashing of conviction and acquittal of the accused upon settlement. (Para 9 , 10)

Order

05/02/2026

1. The matter comes up on an application for early listing of the case.

2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.

3. The instant criminal revision petition under Section 438 read with Section 442 of the BNSS has been preferred by the petitioner being aggrieved by the judgment dated 04.04.2022 passed by the learned Additional Session Judge No.2, Jodhpur Metropolitan in Criminal Appeal No.07/2017, whereby the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 03.04.2017 passed by the learned Special Metropolitan Magistrate (N.I. Act Cases) No.1, Jodhpur Metropolitan in Criminal Original Case No.1713/2013, convicting the petitioner for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentencing him to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 11 months’ alongwith compensation to the tune of Rs.3,15,000/-, was affirmed.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present revision petition, the parties have amicably settled their dispute and a compromise was arrived at between them. It is submitted that the entire due amount has been paid to the complainant-respondent in full satisfaction of his claim. It is further submitted that the offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act is compoundable in nature and, in view of the full payment having been made, no useful purpose would be served in continuing the criminal proceedings. It is also pointed out that the petitioner is not in custody and is presently on bail.

5. Learned counsel for the complainant-respondent, on instructions, does not dispute the factum of compromise and receipt of the entire due amount and submits that the complainant has no objection if the offence is compounded and the judgments passed by both the Courts below are quashed and set aside.

6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant-respondent and perused the material available on record.

7. In the facts of the present case, it is not in dispute that the entire due amount has been paid by the petitioner to the complainant-respondent. The complainant-respondent has received the full amount towards the cheque in question and has expressed his consent for compounding of the offence. The offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act being compoundable in nature, and the dispute having been settled in entirety, this Court is of the considered view that continuation of the conviction would serve no fruitful purpose and the matter deserves to be given a quietus.

8. Upon due consideration of the submissions made and in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, this Court deems it fit and proper to allow the instant criminal revision petition.

9. Accordingly, the instant criminal revision petition is allowed. The judgment dated 03.04.2017 passed by the learned Special Metropolitan Magistrate (N.I. Act Cases) No.1, Jodhpur Metropolitan in Criminal Original Case No.1713/2013 and the judgment dated 04.04.2022 passed by the learned Additional Session Judge No.2, Jodhpur Metropolitan in Criminal Appeal No.07/2017 are hereby quashed and set aside, and the petitioner-accused is acquitted of the charge for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner is not in custody and shall not be required to surrender. His bail bonds shall stand discharged. Any warrant, if issued, shall stand cancelled.

10. All pending applications stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top